Morphological and electrophysiological determination of the projections of jaw-elevator muscle spindle afferents in rats

The fluorescent compound Lucifer Yellow was injected into the somata of nine identified jaw-elevator muscle spindle afferents, located in the V mesencephalic nucleus. Reconstructions of the central course of their axons were subsequently made from serial, transverse, sections to identify sites of projection. Three sites of termination were identified on the basis of collaterals that ended in varicosities and/or boutons. All afferents projected to the V nucleus oralis and, all but one, also to the V motor nucleus. Two out of nine afferents had terminations in the supra-trigeminal nucleus, though a further four appeared to send collaterals to this area. The relative density of projection, judged by the number of collaterals supplied to each area, decreased in the order: V nucleus oralis, V motor nucleus and supra-trigeminal nucleus. The central course of the afferent axons was such that impulses from the periphery would arrive first at the V motor nucleus, then the V nucleus oralis, the supra-trigeminal nucleus, and finally the afferent somata in the V mesencephalic nucleus. In animals in which the masseter nerve was exposed in-continuity for electrical stimulation, electrophysiological recordings were made in the three areas described above to identify units that received a monosynaptic input from spindles in the masseter muscle. Criteria were formulated on the basis of the pattern of responses on stimulation of the masseter nerve, and the morphology of labelled neurones, for differentiating between afferents, interneurones, and motoneurones. In the V motor nucleus, monosynaptic excitatory post-synaptic potentials (e.p.s.p.s) were obtained in both synergist and masseter motoneurones. These were assumed to arise from a masseter muscle spindle input as the thresholds for exciting such afferents and eliciting e.p.s.p.s were similar. Some interneurones, chiefly in the V nucleus oralis, were activated at thresholds close to that of muscle spindle afferents and could also fire in response to muscle stretch. As their latencies (measured extracellularly) were similar to that of e.p.s.p.s in motoneurones, they were assumed to receive a monosynaptic muscle spindle input. However, most interneurones were activated at longer latencies (up to 7 ms) and some also fired to muscle stretch. Arguments are advanced, based on the long rise time of e.p.s.p.s recorded in some, that the majority of these may also be candidates for monosynaptic activation.