Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 5. The effect of spectrum of disease on the performance of diagnostic tests

One highly publicized study reported promising results using a BNP cutoff point of 100 pg/mL.4,5 This cutoff point means that patients with BNP levels greater than 100 pg/mL are considered to have a "positive" test result for congestive heart failure and those with levels below this thresh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2005-08, Vol.173 (4), p.385-390
Hauptverfasser: Montori, Victor M, Wyer, Peter, Newman, Thomas B, Keitz, Sheri, Guyatt, Gordon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:One highly publicized study reported promising results using a BNP cutoff point of 100 pg/mL.4,5 This cutoff point means that patients with BNP levels greater than 100 pg/mL are considered to have a "positive" test result for congestive heart failure and those with levels below this threshold are considered to have a "negative" test result. The investigators compared the number of diagnoses of congestive heart failure using BNP levels with those using a criterion standard (or "gold standard") defined by established clinical and imaging criteria. Commentaries have challenged the investigators' estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of the BNP test at the proposed cutoff point on the basis that clinicians were already confident with respect to the likelihood of congestive heart failure in most of the patients in the study.6,7 If Fig. 1 accurately represented the performance of the BNP test in distinguishing between all patients with and without congestive heart failure as the cause of their symptoms, the test would be very useful. The 2 curves demonstrate very little overlap. For BNP values below 90 pg/mL (point A), no patients have congestive heart failure, and for BNP values above 110 pg/mL (point B), all patients have congestive heart failure. This means, assuming that Fig. 1 reflects reality, that you can be completely certain about the diagnosis for all people with BNP values below 90 pg/mL or above 110 pg/mL. Only for patients whose BNP values are between 90 and 110 pg/mL is there residual uncertainty about their likelihood of congestive heart failure. It may be helpful to note that the sensitivity of the BNP test at a cutoff value of 100 pg/mL (the proportion of patients with acute congestive heart failure whose BNP level is greater than 100 pg/mL) is defined in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 as the percentage of the total area of the right-hand curve that lies to the right of the cutoff value. Notice that this percentage is markedly lower in Fig. 2 than in Fig. 1. The same is true of specificity, which is the proportion of patients without acute congestive heart failure whose BNP level is less than 100 pg/mL. This is defined in the figures as the proportion of the left-hand curve that lies to the left of the cutoff point. Again this percentage is appreciably lower in Fig. 2 compared with Fig. 1.
ISSN:0820-3946
1488-2329
DOI:10.1503/cmaj.1031666