Evidence for a contribution of the motor cortex to the long-latency stretch reflex of the human thumb
1. In normal subjects, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the hand region of the motor cortex evokes motor responses only in contralateral hand muscles at a latency of about 19-24 ms. In contrast, stimulation of the motor cortex of three mirror movement subjects evoked, nearly simultaneously, moto...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of physiology 1991-08, Vol.440 (1), p.243-255 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1. In normal subjects, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the hand region of the motor cortex evokes motor responses only
in contralateral hand muscles at a latency of about 19-24 ms. In contrast, stimulation of the motor cortex of three mirror
movement subjects evoked, nearly simultaneously, motor responses in hand muscles on both sides of the body at latencies similar
to those of normal subjects. In these subjects no other neuroanatomical pathways appear to be abnormally directed across the
mid-line. Thus, their mirror movements are probably due to a projection of the corticospinal tract to homologous motoneurone
pools on each side of the body. 2. We reasoned that if the motor cortex contributes to the generation of long-latency stretch
reflex responses then in these mirror movement subjects stretching a muscle on one side of the body should produce long-latency
reflex responses in the ipsilateral and the homologous contralateral muscle. 3. To test this idea experiments were done on
normal human subjects and on the subjects with mirror movements. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the flexor pollicis
longus muscle (FPL) on each side of the body was recorded. Stretch of the distal phalanx of the thumb of one hand produced
a series of distinct reflex EMG responses in the ipsilateral FPL. The earliest response, when present, began at 25 ms (S.D.
= 3.5 ms) and was followed by responses at 40 (S.D. = 3.9 ms) and 56 ms (S.D. = 4.3 ms). There was no difference, either in
timing or intensity, between the ipsilateral FPL EMG responses of normal subjects and those of the mirror movement subjects.
4. No response of any kind was observed in the contralateral (unstretched) FPL of normal subjects. In contrast, we observed
in all three mirror movement subjects EMG responses in the contralateral (unstretched) FPL beginning at 45-50 ms. The latency
of this response is considerably shorter than the fastest voluntary kinaesthetic reaction time, which was on average 130 ms
(S.D. = 11 ms). The contralateral long-latency EMG response observed in the mirror movement subjects was on average 30% (range
5-60%) of that on the ipsilateral side. No short-latency response (25 ms) was ever observed in the contralateral FPL of these
subjects. 5. These observations are quite consistent with the idea that the long-latency stretch reflex responses of hand
and finger muscles are produced, at least in part, by the motor cortex. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3751 1469-7793 |
DOI: | 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018706 |