Common practices of dental implant maintenance among dental hygienists working in the Netherlands – A survey
Background Dental implant maintenance is crucial to obtain and maintain a healthy peri‐implant situation. Although it is part of a dental hygienists (DH) scope of practice, the knowledge and common practices among DHs in the Netherlands are unclear. Materials and Methods A web‐based survey was distr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of dental hygiene 2025-02, Vol.23 (1), p.14-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Dental implant maintenance is crucial to obtain and maintain a healthy peri‐implant situation. Although it is part of a dental hygienists (DH) scope of practice, the knowledge and common practices among DHs in the Netherlands are unclear.
Materials and Methods
A web‐based survey was distributed by the Dutch Association of DHs, by spreading survey QR codes and snowballing. The role of the different DH curricula 2‐ or 3‐year diploma and a 4‐year bachelor's degree is evaluated.
Results
In total, 165 (diploma: 73, bachelor: 92) DHs responded. Peri‐implant diseases were well known (98%), indices and clinical symptoms were used to assess peri‐implant tissues. A periodontal probe (97%) was used and bone loss was evaluated on radiographs (89%). Treatment was performed supra‐ and subgingivally (69%), mostly by titanium (45%) or plastic hand instruments (42%). Ultrasonic (52%) and air‐abrasive (52%) devices were often used. The recall interval for maintenance was based on a risk‐adjusted protocol (70%). DHs with a bachelor's received significantly more training compared to DHs with a diploma during primary education (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1601-5029 1601-5037 1601-5037 |
DOI: | 10.1111/idh.12841 |