Multimodal phenotyping of successful cognitive aging

Background While some memory decline in old age is “normal”, there are some older individuals with maintained high cognitive performance. Using a multimodal approach including neuroimaging, fitness, genetic and questionnaire data (Fig1A), we aimed to identify factors that are related to successful c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2025-01, Vol.20 (Suppl 9), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Behrenbruch, Niklas, Molloy, Eóin N., Schwarck, Svenja, Schumann‐Werner, Beate, Garcia‐Garcia, Berta, Vockert, Niklas, Morgado, Barbara, Rullmann, Michael, Hochkeppler, Anne, Fischer, Larissa, Baldauf, Kathrin, Schulze, Peter, Müller, Patrick, Stephens, Andrew W., Patt, Marianne, Schildan, Andreas, Behnisch, Gusalija, Seidenbecher, Constanze I., Schott, Björn H., Esselmann, Hermann, Wiltfang, Jens, Barthel, Henryk, Sabri, Osama, Kreißl, Michael C., Düzel, Emrah, Maass, Anne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background While some memory decline in old age is “normal”, there are some older individuals with maintained high cognitive performance. Using a multimodal approach including neuroimaging, fitness, genetic and questionnaire data (Fig1A), we aimed to identify factors that are related to successful cognitive aging and whether these differ between sexes. Method We analyzed 165 cognitively normal older adults age = 60 years from an ongoing study (SFB1436) (age = 71±8years, 43% female). For all participants, we determined plasma Abeta1‐42/Abeta1‐40. Temporal lobe tau burden was estimated by [18F]PI‐2620 in a subsample (see Fig.1A for sample sizes). We assessed global white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volumes and gray matter thickness for medial temporal lobe (MTL), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and whole brain. We measured aerobic and muscular capacity (and blood pressure) by fitness assessment and trait/state anxiety by self‐reports. Genetic profiling included KLOTHO and KIBRA polymorphisms and APOE genotype. To phenotype successful cognitive aging, we i) grouped individuals age = 79.5 years into SuperAgers (N = 18) based on delayed verbal recall performance = normative values at age of 50‐60 years versus typical agers (N = 19). For the whole sample we ii) calculated cognitive age gap (CAG) as the difference between cognition‐predicted age and chronological age (Fig.3A). We assessed how markers of pathology, brain structure, fitness, mental health and genetics were related to CAG, covarying for chronological age, sex and education. Result SuperAgers and typical agers did not differ in age, sex, education, fitness, anxiety or Abeta42/40 (all p‐values>0.1). However, SuperAgers had less WMH volume, higher ACC thickness, lower blood pressure and less temporal lobe tau‐tracer binding (small subgroup;). In the whole sample, younger cognitive age related to higher MTL and global cortical thickness, less temporal tau‐tracer binding, less anxiety (all p
ISSN:1552-5260
1552-5279
DOI:10.1002/alz.093952