Single‐nuclei transcriptomic identifies type‐specific neuronal cell vulnerability in Amnestic and Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia Alzheimer’s disease

Background Individuals meeting neuropathological criteria for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may manifest with atypical clinical syndromes. Past work showed that the neurobiological basis for these differences is related to specific neuronal vulnerabilities for tau pathology. For instance, amnestic cases...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2024-12, Vol.20 (S1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Pereira, Felipe Luiz, Lew, Caroline, Li, Song Hua, Rizzi, Liara, Araujo, Igor Prufer Q C, Soloviev, Alexander V., Spina, Salvatore, Rexach, Jessica E, Seeley, William W., Suemoto, Claudia Kimie, Leite, Renata Elaine Paraizo, Newell, Kathy L, Ghetti, Bernardino, Murray, Melissa E., Grinberg, Lea T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Individuals meeting neuropathological criteria for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may manifest with atypical clinical syndromes. Past work showed that the neurobiological basis for these differences is related to specific neuronal vulnerabilities for tau pathology. For instance, amnestic cases have a higher burden of neurofibrillary changes in CA1. In contrast, logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) cases have a higher tau burden in the superior temporal gyrus (STG). Single‐cell technology enables investigations on the molecular basis of differential neuronal vulnerability in AD. Consequently, we delved into the factors that underlie this selective vulnerability by analyzing brain samples from individuals exclusively afflicted with AD but exhibiting diverse clinical manifestations. Method snRNA Sequencing using the Chromium Single Cell 3′ (10X Genomics, USA) on nuclei cells extracted from the CA1 sector and posterior STG of postmortem brain tissue of 48 individuals either meeting pathological criteria for AD (A3B3C3; 24 amnestic and eleven lvPPA) and healthy controls (A≤1B≤1C≤1; n = 13) (Table 1, Fig. 1A/B). Bioinformatics analyses were conducted using Cell Ranger and R software. Comparisons between cell subpopulations were conducted with the Wald statistical test, and p‐values
ISSN:1552-5260
1552-5279
DOI:10.1002/alz.091703