Deletions at stalled replication forks occur by two different pathways
Replication blockage induces non‐homologous deletions in Escherichia coli . The mechanism of the formation of these deletions was investigated. A pBR322–mini‐ oriC hybrid plasmid carrying two E.coli replication terminators ( Ter sites) in opposite orientations was used. Deletions which remove at lea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The EMBO journal 1997-06, Vol.16 (11), p.3332-3340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Replication blockage induces non‐homologous deletions in
Escherichia coli
. The mechanism of the formation of these deletions was investigated. A pBR322–mini‐
oriC
hybrid plasmid carrying two
E.coli
replication terminators (
Ter
sites) in opposite orientations was used. Deletions which remove at least the pBR322 blocking site (named
Ter
1) occurred at a frequency of 2×10
−6
per generation. They fall into two equally large classes: deletions that join sequences with no homology, and others that join sequences of 3–10 bp of homology. Some 95% of the deletions in the former class resulted from the fusion of sequences immediately preceding the two
Ter
sites, indicating a direct role for blocked replication forks in their formation. These deletions were not found in a
topA
10 mutant, suggesting a topoisomerase I‐mediated process. In contrast, deletions joining short homologous sequences were not affected by the
topA
10 mutation. However, the incidence of this second class of deletions increased 10‐fold in a
recD
mutant, devoid of exonuclease V activity. This indicates that linear molecules are intermediates in their formation. In addition, ∼50% of these deletions were clustered in the region flanking the
Ter
1 site. We propose that they are produced by repair of molecules broken at the blocked replication forks. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0261-4189 1460-2075 1460-2075 |
DOI: | 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3332 |