The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in ankle disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ankle osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition that significantly impairs patients' quality of life. Platelet-rich plasma has emerged as a novel cellular therapy in clinical practice. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) after intervention in ankle disorder...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2024-12, Vol.19 (1), p.895, Article 895
Hauptverfasser: Ding, Qixin, Wang, Xu, Liu, Yurong, Li, Yuefang, Zhang, Di, Wang, Heling, Ma, Shenhong, Han, Qiaohua, Zhuang, Weisheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ankle osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition that significantly impairs patients' quality of life. Platelet-rich plasma has emerged as a novel cellular therapy in clinical practice. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) after intervention in ankle disorders, so as to provide strong evidence in support of clinical treatment. A comprehensive and systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and web of science databases was performed, and studies that met the requirements according to the inclusion criteria were analyzed using Review Manager and STATA version 14.0. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. The outcome indicators were the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Rating Scale (AOFAS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores used to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma. A total of 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Regarding the AOFAS score, a meta-analysis that included five randomized controlled trials (each study extracted the score results at the last follow-up time) showed no statistically significant differences between the platelet-rich plasma intervention group and the control group, and there was a great deal of heterogeneity in the results, with subgroup analyses based on disease type. (Mean Difference = 4.14, 95% CI=-0.60-8.87, p = 0.09, I  = 86%). Subgroup analysis showed a more significant effect in patients with talar cartilage injuries (Mean Difference = 8.66, 95%CI = 6.61-10.71, p 
ISSN:1749-799X
1749-799X
DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05420-5