Behaviour settings as a way to order types of situations for the study of speech aids

This article revisits the notion of behaviour settings, coined by Roger G. Barker (Barker 1968, . , 39-55 (10.1080/10407413.2016.1121744)), as a useful concept for the analysis of situations and communicative needs of persons after larynx removal surgery (laryngectomy). We claim that behaviour setti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2024-09, Vol.379 (1910), p.20230290
Hauptverfasser: Zieliński, Konrad, Rączaszek-Leonardi, Joanna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article revisits the notion of behaviour settings, coined by Roger G. Barker (Barker 1968, . , 39-55 (10.1080/10407413.2016.1121744)), as a useful concept for the analysis of situations and communicative needs of persons after larynx removal surgery (laryngectomy). We claim that behaviour settings offer a way to characterize types of situations and types of participation, which, in turn, helps to identify aspects of communication where compensation is needed; these steps are crucial in the design process of reliable and context-sensitive speech aids. Moreover, we advocate complementing the behaviour setting concept as a unit of analysis with modern developments in the cognitive sciences, such as conversational analysis of co-operative actions (Goodwin 2017, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (10.1017/9781139016735)) and the analysis of multi-perspectival experience (De Jaegher 2021, . , 847-870 (10.1007/s11097-019-09634-5)). Such an integration of macro- and micro-level patterns should help discover the relevant relations and values in particular situations. We illustrate our claims with examples from Barker's own work and from our ongoing analyses of the everyday life of persons after laryngectomy. This article is part of the theme issue 'People, places, things, and communities: expanding behaviour settings theory in the twenty-first century'.
ISSN:0962-8436
1471-2970
1471-2970
DOI:10.1098/rstb.2023.0290