Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non‐Fermenting Gram‐Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain
ABSTRACT Managing infections caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli is a major public health concern, particularly in hospitals where surfaces can act as reservoirs for resistant microorganisms. Identifying these bacteria in hospital environments is crucial for improving healthcare safe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental microbiology reports 2024-12, Vol.16 (6), p.e70055-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e70055 |
container_title | Environmental microbiology reports |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo Ayllón Santiago, Tania |
description | ABSTRACT
Managing infections caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli is a major public health concern, particularly in hospitals where surfaces can act as reservoirs for resistant microorganisms. Identifying these bacteria in hospital environments is crucial for improving healthcare safety. This study aimed to analyse environmental samples from a veterinary hospital to identify prevalent microorganisms and detect antimicrobial resistance patterns. A total of 183 surface samples were collected from 26 areas at the Veterinary Clinical Hospital of Alfonso X el Sabio University in Madrid. The isolated strains were identified, and susceptibility profiles were determined via the disk diffusion method. Clonality analysis was performed using pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis. In total, 109 strains were isolated: 76.15% from the Enterobacteriaceae family and 23.85% non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The isolates included Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia and Pseudomonas species, which could include high‐risk clones, given their ability to carry several antimicrobial resistance genes. The equine area had the highest number of isolates (n = 71), accounting for 65% of the total. High resistance indices were observed against at least five of the 16 antibiotics tested, indicating significant multidrug resistance. Clonality analysis suggested potential cross‐transmission within the facility. This study sampled hospital surfaces but not personnel or animals, making contamination sources unclear. Without resampling, the effectiveness of cleaning protocols remains uncertain. Results suggest that hospital staff play a key role in bacterial transmission. The lack of specialised preventive measures in veterinary hospitals highlights a need for further research and improvement.
This study examined bacterial contamination on surfaces within a veterinary hospital in Madrid, isolating 109 bacterial strains, predominantly Enterobacteriaceae and non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The highest contamination was found in the equine area, with strains showing resistance to multiple antibiotics. These findings highlight the potential for cross‐transmission within the facility and the need for improved infection control protocols in veterinary environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1758-2229.70055 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11665279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3148500961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1995-ede9f99f35b8a3beeb9236e676d0eebc0fc83661ed1e918dda3ae2ce5ced75e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIfsCZG_KRQ7e1k40Tn1BZdtuV2oJU4Go59mQZ5NjBzi7aW38C_41_wC_B6ZZVOeHL2DNv3jz5TZa9YvSUpXPGqrKe5HkuTitKy_JJdrjPPH10P8iOYvxGKZ8Kmj_PDgpRsWlVF4fZr48BNsqC03BC3mMcAjbrAb0jyhly7gbsUAffoLLkdh019AM2aHHYEt-SuRsgFZVOAZUGBfdtN979vvu5gNBBInArchFUlzI3sFIDboC8UxqtRbKM3qoBDFkE3yW2DQbvxqZxmup6C5FgkkK-wDjBqbAlM4sOdQJc-tjjiEyIa2UCmhNy2yt0L7JnrbIRXj7E4-zzYv5pdjm5-nCxnJ1fTTQTopyAAdEK0RZlU6uiAWhEXnDgFTc0PTRtdV1wzsAwEKw2RhUKcg2lBlOVUBfH2dsdb79uOjA66Q7Kyj5gl4RKr1D-W3H4Va78RjLGeZlXIjG8eWAI_vsa4iA7TH9srXLg11EWbFqXlArOEvRsB01uxBig3c9hVI67IEe35ei2vN-F1PH6sbw9_q_5CcB3gB9oYfs_Pjm_Xk53zH8AVzjIRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3148500961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non‐Fermenting Gram‐Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio ; Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia ; Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario ; Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo ; Ayllón Santiago, Tania</creator><creatorcontrib>Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio ; Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia ; Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario ; Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo ; Ayllón Santiago, Tania</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Managing infections caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli is a major public health concern, particularly in hospitals where surfaces can act as reservoirs for resistant microorganisms. Identifying these bacteria in hospital environments is crucial for improving healthcare safety. This study aimed to analyse environmental samples from a veterinary hospital to identify prevalent microorganisms and detect antimicrobial resistance patterns. A total of 183 surface samples were collected from 26 areas at the Veterinary Clinical Hospital of Alfonso X el Sabio University in Madrid. The isolated strains were identified, and susceptibility profiles were determined via the disk diffusion method. Clonality analysis was performed using pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis. In total, 109 strains were isolated: 76.15% from the Enterobacteriaceae family and 23.85% non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The isolates included Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia and Pseudomonas species, which could include high‐risk clones, given their ability to carry several antimicrobial resistance genes. The equine area had the highest number of isolates (n = 71), accounting for 65% of the total. High resistance indices were observed against at least five of the 16 antibiotics tested, indicating significant multidrug resistance. Clonality analysis suggested potential cross‐transmission within the facility. This study sampled hospital surfaces but not personnel or animals, making contamination sources unclear. Without resampling, the effectiveness of cleaning protocols remains uncertain. Results suggest that hospital staff play a key role in bacterial transmission. The lack of specialised preventive measures in veterinary hospitals highlights a need for further research and improvement.
This study examined bacterial contamination on surfaces within a veterinary hospital in Madrid, isolating 109 bacterial strains, predominantly Enterobacteriaceae and non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The highest contamination was found in the equine area, with strains showing resistance to multiple antibiotics. These findings highlight the potential for cross‐transmission within the facility and the need for improved infection control protocols in veterinary environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-2229</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-2229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.70055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39714783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; antimicrobial resistance ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial - genetics ; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field ; Enterobacteriaceae ; Enterobacteriaceae - classification ; Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects ; Enterobacteriaceae - genetics ; Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification ; Environmental Microbiology ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - classification ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - genetics ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Hospitals, Animal ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; non‐fermenting gram‐negative bacilli ; nosocomial infections ; Prevalence ; Spain ; veterinary hospital</subject><ispartof>Environmental microbiology reports, 2024-12, Vol.16 (6), p.e70055-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Environmental Microbiology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1995-ede9f99f35b8a3beeb9236e676d0eebc0fc83661ed1e918dda3ae2ce5ced75e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8825-1696 ; 0000-0002-1195-5078 ; 0000-0002-8242-2658 ; 0000-0001-9199-7341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665279/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665279/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1416,11561,27923,27924,45573,45574,46051,46475,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39714783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayllón Santiago, Tania</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non‐Fermenting Gram‐Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain</title><title>Environmental microbiology reports</title><addtitle>Environ Microbiol Rep</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Managing infections caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli is a major public health concern, particularly in hospitals where surfaces can act as reservoirs for resistant microorganisms. Identifying these bacteria in hospital environments is crucial for improving healthcare safety. This study aimed to analyse environmental samples from a veterinary hospital to identify prevalent microorganisms and detect antimicrobial resistance patterns. A total of 183 surface samples were collected from 26 areas at the Veterinary Clinical Hospital of Alfonso X el Sabio University in Madrid. The isolated strains were identified, and susceptibility profiles were determined via the disk diffusion method. Clonality analysis was performed using pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis. In total, 109 strains were isolated: 76.15% from the Enterobacteriaceae family and 23.85% non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The isolates included Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia and Pseudomonas species, which could include high‐risk clones, given their ability to carry several antimicrobial resistance genes. The equine area had the highest number of isolates (n = 71), accounting for 65% of the total. High resistance indices were observed against at least five of the 16 antibiotics tested, indicating significant multidrug resistance. Clonality analysis suggested potential cross‐transmission within the facility. This study sampled hospital surfaces but not personnel or animals, making contamination sources unclear. Without resampling, the effectiveness of cleaning protocols remains uncertain. Results suggest that hospital staff play a key role in bacterial transmission. The lack of specialised preventive measures in veterinary hospitals highlights a need for further research and improvement.
This study examined bacterial contamination on surfaces within a veterinary hospital in Madrid, isolating 109 bacterial strains, predominantly Enterobacteriaceae and non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The highest contamination was found in the equine area, with strains showing resistance to multiple antibiotics. These findings highlight the potential for cross‐transmission within the facility and the need for improved infection control protocols in veterinary environments.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - classification</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - genetics</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Environmental Microbiology</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Hospitals, Animal</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>non‐fermenting gram‐negative bacilli</subject><subject>nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>veterinary hospital</subject><issn>1758-2229</issn><issn>1758-2229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIfsCZG_KRQ7e1k40Tn1BZdtuV2oJU4Go59mQZ5NjBzi7aW38C_41_wC_B6ZZVOeHL2DNv3jz5TZa9YvSUpXPGqrKe5HkuTitKy_JJdrjPPH10P8iOYvxGKZ8Kmj_PDgpRsWlVF4fZr48BNsqC03BC3mMcAjbrAb0jyhly7gbsUAffoLLkdh019AM2aHHYEt-SuRsgFZVOAZUGBfdtN979vvu5gNBBInArchFUlzI3sFIDboC8UxqtRbKM3qoBDFkE3yW2DQbvxqZxmup6C5FgkkK-wDjBqbAlM4sOdQJc-tjjiEyIa2UCmhNy2yt0L7JnrbIRXj7E4-zzYv5pdjm5-nCxnJ1fTTQTopyAAdEK0RZlU6uiAWhEXnDgFTc0PTRtdV1wzsAwEKw2RhUKcg2lBlOVUBfH2dsdb79uOjA66Q7Kyj5gl4RKr1D-W3H4Va78RjLGeZlXIjG8eWAI_vsa4iA7TH9srXLg11EWbFqXlArOEvRsB01uxBig3c9hVI67IEe35ei2vN-F1PH6sbw9_q_5CcB3gB9oYfs_Pjm_Xk53zH8AVzjIRA</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio</creator><creator>Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia</creator><creator>Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario</creator><creator>Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo</creator><creator>Ayllón Santiago, Tania</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8825-1696</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1195-5078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-2658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-7341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non‐Fermenting Gram‐Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain</title><author>Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio ; Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia ; Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario ; Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo ; Ayllón Santiago, Tania</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1995-ede9f99f35b8a3beeb9236e676d0eebc0fc83661ed1e918dda3ae2ce5ced75e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - classification</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - genetics</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Environmental Microbiology</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Hospitals, Animal</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>non‐fermenting gram‐negative bacilli</topic><topic>nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>veterinary hospital</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayllón Santiago, Tania</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental microbiology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio</au><au>Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia</au><au>Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario</au><au>Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo</au><au>Ayllón Santiago, Tania</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non‐Fermenting Gram‐Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain</atitle><jtitle>Environmental microbiology reports</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Microbiol Rep</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e70055</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e70055-n/a</pages><issn>1758-2229</issn><eissn>1758-2229</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Managing infections caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli is a major public health concern, particularly in hospitals where surfaces can act as reservoirs for resistant microorganisms. Identifying these bacteria in hospital environments is crucial for improving healthcare safety. This study aimed to analyse environmental samples from a veterinary hospital to identify prevalent microorganisms and detect antimicrobial resistance patterns. A total of 183 surface samples were collected from 26 areas at the Veterinary Clinical Hospital of Alfonso X el Sabio University in Madrid. The isolated strains were identified, and susceptibility profiles were determined via the disk diffusion method. Clonality analysis was performed using pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis. In total, 109 strains were isolated: 76.15% from the Enterobacteriaceae family and 23.85% non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The isolates included Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia and Pseudomonas species, which could include high‐risk clones, given their ability to carry several antimicrobial resistance genes. The equine area had the highest number of isolates (n = 71), accounting for 65% of the total. High resistance indices were observed against at least five of the 16 antibiotics tested, indicating significant multidrug resistance. Clonality analysis suggested potential cross‐transmission within the facility. This study sampled hospital surfaces but not personnel or animals, making contamination sources unclear. Without resampling, the effectiveness of cleaning protocols remains uncertain. Results suggest that hospital staff play a key role in bacterial transmission. The lack of specialised preventive measures in veterinary hospitals highlights a need for further research and improvement.
This study examined bacterial contamination on surfaces within a veterinary hospital in Madrid, isolating 109 bacterial strains, predominantly Enterobacteriaceae and non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The highest contamination was found in the equine area, with strains showing resistance to multiple antibiotics. These findings highlight the potential for cross‐transmission within the facility and the need for improved infection control protocols in veterinary environments.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39714783</pmid><doi>10.1111/1758-2229.70055</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8825-1696</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1195-5078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-2658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-7341</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-2229 |
ispartof | Environmental microbiology reports, 2024-12, Vol.16 (6), p.e70055-n/a |
issn | 1758-2229 1758-2229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11665279 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology antimicrobial resistance Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial - genetics Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field Enterobacteriaceae Enterobacteriaceae - classification Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects Enterobacteriaceae - genetics Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification Environmental Microbiology Gram-Negative Bacteria - classification Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects Gram-Negative Bacteria - genetics Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification Hospitals, Animal Microbial Sensitivity Tests non‐fermenting gram‐negative bacilli nosocomial infections Prevalence Spain veterinary hospital |
title | Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non‐Fermenting Gram‐Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A56%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence,%20Distribution%20and%20Antimicrobial%20Susceptibility%20of%20Enterobacteriaceae%20and%20Non%E2%80%90Fermenting%20Gram%E2%80%90Negative%20Bacilli%20Isolated%20From%20Environmental%20Samples%20in%20a%20Veterinary%20Clinical%20Hospital%20in%20Madrid,%20Spain&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20microbiology%20reports&rft.au=P%C3%A9rez%20Jim%C3%A9nez,%20Jes%C3%BAs%20Antonio&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e70055&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e70055-n/a&rft.issn=1758-2229&rft.eissn=1758-2229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3148500961%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3148500961&rft_id=info:pmid/39714783&rfr_iscdi=true |