Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non‐Fermenting Gram‐Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain

ABSTRACT Managing infections caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli is a major public health concern, particularly in hospitals where surfaces can act as reservoirs for resistant microorganisms. Identifying these bacteria in hospital environments is crucial for improving healthcare safe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental microbiology reports 2024-12, Vol.16 (6), p.e70055-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Pérez Jiménez, Jesús Antonio, Penelo Hidalgo, Silvia, Baquero Artigao, María‐Rosario, Ortiz‐Díez, Gustavo, Ayllón Santiago, Tania
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Managing infections caused by multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative bacilli is a major public health concern, particularly in hospitals where surfaces can act as reservoirs for resistant microorganisms. Identifying these bacteria in hospital environments is crucial for improving healthcare safety. This study aimed to analyse environmental samples from a veterinary hospital to identify prevalent microorganisms and detect antimicrobial resistance patterns. A total of 183 surface samples were collected from 26 areas at the Veterinary Clinical Hospital of Alfonso X el Sabio University in Madrid. The isolated strains were identified, and susceptibility profiles were determined via the disk diffusion method. Clonality analysis was performed using pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis. In total, 109 strains were isolated: 76.15% from the Enterobacteriaceae family and 23.85% non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The isolates included Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia and Pseudomonas species, which could include high‐risk clones, given their ability to carry several antimicrobial resistance genes. The equine area had the highest number of isolates (n = 71), accounting for 65% of the total. High resistance indices were observed against at least five of the 16 antibiotics tested, indicating significant multidrug resistance. Clonality analysis suggested potential cross‐transmission within the facility. This study sampled hospital surfaces but not personnel or animals, making contamination sources unclear. Without resampling, the effectiveness of cleaning protocols remains uncertain. Results suggest that hospital staff play a key role in bacterial transmission. The lack of specialised preventive measures in veterinary hospitals highlights a need for further research and improvement. This study examined bacterial contamination on surfaces within a veterinary hospital in Madrid, isolating 109 bacterial strains, predominantly Enterobacteriaceae and non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli. The highest contamination was found in the equine area, with strains showing resistance to multiple antibiotics. These findings highlight the potential for cross‐transmission within the facility and the need for improved infection control protocols in veterinary environments.
ISSN:1758-2229
1758-2229
DOI:10.1111/1758-2229.70055