Antibiotic treatment of bacterial lung infections in cystic fibrosis

Bacterial infections of the lower airways are the main cause of mortality and morbidity in cystic fibrosis. The most frequently isolated pathogens are S. aureus and P. aeruginosa ; bacterial co-infections are frequently observed. The aim of this review is to provide, in the current context, the indications regarding the best antibiotic strategy to adopt in subjects affected by CF infected with the most common pathogens. We selected relevant publications (guidelines, systematic reviews and clinical studies published so far on these topics) and we analysed the sampling methods used and antibiotic strategies adopted. Oropharyngeal sampling methods are considered less sensitive for pathogen detection than sputum. In non-expectorating people, induced sputum is considered equivalent to two-lobe bronchoalveolar lavage, which is considered invasive. Antibiotic treatment against the main pathogens can consist in eradication treatment in the early stages of infection, chronic suppressive therapy and treatment of the pulmonary exacerbations. This scheme is valid for P. aeruginosa but remains to be demonstrated for the other pathogens. For S. aureus , no evidence-based therapeutic strategies on how to treat the different stages of bacterial infection have been established with certainty. With regard to the treatment of the other classic pathogens ( B. cepacia complex, A. xylosoxidans and S. maltophilia ), no evidence-based indications exist and decision is left to the clinician. The recent introduction of highly effective modulators on the CFTR protein, in addition to the favourable effects described in regulatory trials, has led to a reduction in bacterial isolations; the real effect of which in clinical practice has still to be assessed on the basis of scientific data. Conclusions The reliability of culture examination depends on sampling methods, and expectorated sputum continues to be the best method as it is simple and non-invasive. P. aeruginosa is the pathogen for which antibiotic strategies for the various stages of infection appear best established, and the efficacy of early eradication treatment and chronic suppressive therapy have been underlined in clinical trials and systematic reviews. The recent introduction of modulators into clinical practice, despite their widely described efficacy, has not yet led to suggestions for changes in antibiotic strategies against the pathogens most frequently isolated.