AI assistance in aesthetic medicine–A consensus on objective medical standards

Background Aesthetic medicine has traditionally relied on clinical scales for the objective assessment of baseline appearance and treatment outcomes. However, the scales focus on limited aesthetic areas mostly and subjective interpretation inherent in these scales can lead to variability, which unde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2024-12, Vol.23 (12), p.4110-4115
Hauptverfasser: Frank, Konstantin, Day, Doris, Few, Julius, Chiranjiv, Chhabra, Gold, Michael, Sattler, Sonja, Kerscher, Martina, Knoedler, Leonard, Filippo, Alexandre, Rzany, Berthold, Cotofana, Sebastian, Fabi, Sabrina, Fritz, Klaus, Peng, Peter, Wanitphakdeedecha, Rungsima, Pooth, Rainer, Huang, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Aesthetic medicine has traditionally relied on clinical scales for the objective assessment of baseline appearance and treatment outcomes. However, the scales focus on limited aesthetic areas mostly and subjective interpretation inherent in these scales can lead to variability, which undermines standardization efforts. Objective The consensus meeting aimed to establish guidelines for AI application in aesthetic medicine. Materials and Methods In February 2024, the AI Consensus Group, comprising international experts in various specialties, convened to deliberate on AI in aesthetic medicine. The methodology included a pre‐consensus survey and an iterative consensus process during the meeting. Results AI's implementation in Aesthetic Medicine has achieved full consensus for enhancing patient assessment and consultation, ensuring standardized care. AI's role in preventing overcorrection is recognized, alongside the need for validated objective facial assessments. Emphasis is placed on comprehensive facial aesthetic evaluations using indices such as the Facial Aesthetic Index (FAI), Facial Youth Index (FYI), and Skin Quality Index (SQI). These evaluations are to be gender‐specific and exclude makeup‐covered skin at baseline. Age and gender, as well as patients' ancestral roots, are to be considered integral to the AI assessment process, underlining the move towards personalized, precise treatments. Conclusion The consensus meeting established that AI will significantly improve aesthetic medicine by standardizing patient assessments and consultations, with a strong endorsement for preventing overcorrection and advocating for validated, objective facial assessments. Utilizing indices such as the FAI, FYI, and SQI allows for gender‐specific, age adjusted evaluations and insists on a makeup‐free baseline for accuracy.
ISSN:1473-2130
1473-2165
1473-2165
DOI:10.1111/jocd.16481