Advancing respiratory virus diagnostics: integrating the nasal IFN-I score for improved viral detection

This study aimed to demonstrate the utility of the nasal Type I interferon (IFN-I) response as a marker for respiratory viral infections (RVIs) and its potential to enhance diagnosis when combined with first-line PCR tests for Influenza A/B, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) from patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:EBioMedicine 2024-12, Vol.110, p.105450, Article 105450
Hauptverfasser: Mommert-Tripon, Marine, Parraud, Delphine, Grosbois, Cloé, Gaymard, Alexandre, Cheynet, Valérie, Lina, Bruno, Oriol, Guy, Laurent, Frédéric, Dupré, Caroline, Semanas, Quentin, Bal, Antonin, Generenaz, Laurence, Pons, Sylvie, Brengel-Pesce, Karen, Guichard, Audrey, Mouton, William, Morfin, Florence, Fleurie, Aurore, Trouillet-Assant, Sophie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to demonstrate the utility of the nasal Type I interferon (IFN-I) response as a marker for respiratory viral infections (RVIs) and its potential to enhance diagnosis when combined with first-line PCR tests for Influenza A/B, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) from patients at Hospices Civils de Lyon (November 2022–April 2024) suspected of viral infections (n = 788) and from healthy controls (n = 53) were analysed. The IFN-I score was measured using the FILMARRAY® IFN-I pouch prototype, which detects four interferon-stimulated genes. The study evaluated the performance of the IFN-I score in detecting samples positive for viruses by first-line PCR and assessed its benefit in diagnosing RVIs in samples initially classified as negative by PCR. Out of 788 NPS included, 504 (64%) were positive with the first-line PCR tests, and IFN-I score was significantly higher in those samples (median [IQR]: 13.00 [2.76–45.40]) compared to ones collected from healthy controls (1.09 [0.67–1.30]; p 
ISSN:2352-3964
2352-3964
DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105450