Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in patients with peripheral artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and routinely obtained parameter reflecting systemic inflammation, including in peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods: This systematic review aimed to assess the role of NLR as a prognostic biomarker in patients with PAD. A systemat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vascular medicine (London, England) England), 2024-12, Vol.29 (6), p.687-699
Hauptverfasser: Kurniawan, Roy B, Siahaan, Paulus P, Saputra, Pandit BT, Arnindita, Jannatin N, Savitri, Cornelia G, Faizah, Novia N, Andira, Luqman H, D’Oria, Mario, Eko Putranto, J Nugroho, Alkaff, Firas F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and routinely obtained parameter reflecting systemic inflammation, including in peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods: This systematic review aimed to assess the role of NLR as a prognostic biomarker in patients with PAD. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool risk ratios, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A bivariate model was used to generate summary receiver operating characteristics with the corresponding area under the curve (AUC). Results: This review included 5243 patients with PAD from nine eligible studies. High NLR corresponded to at least a twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM), major adverse limb events (MALE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). NLR’s performance was good for predicting 1-year ACM (AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59–0.79], sensitivity 58.2% [95% CI: 45.3–71.0], specificity 72.6% [95% CI: 65.6–79.62], PPV 41.0% [95% CI: 31.2–50.7], NPV 82.7% [95% CI: 74.1–91.3]) and 1-year MALE (AUC 0.78 [95% CI: 0.75–0.80], sensitivity 65.4% [95% CI: 41.6–89.2], specificity 77.7% [95% CI: 71.0–84.3], PPV 53.7% [95% CI: 47.3–60.1], NPV 83.91% [95% CI: 73.2–94.6]). However, these values tended to decrease as the follow-up duration extended, except for the pooled specificities, which exhibited the opposite pattern. Conclusion: NLR emerges as a simple and cost-effective prognostic biomarker with decent performance for poor outcomes in patients with PAD (PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023486607).
ISSN:1358-863X
1477-0377
1477-0377
DOI:10.1177/1358863X241281699