Anatomical vs. electrophysiological approach for ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the left ventricular summit (ISESHIMA-SUMMIT Study)
Abstract Aims Catheter ablation (CA) of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) from the epicardial left ventricular summit is challenging. The endocardial approach targets two sites: the endocardial closest site (ECS) to the epicardial earliest activation site (epi-EAS) and the endocardial earlies...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Europace (London, England) England), 2024-11, Vol.26 (11) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Aims
Catheter ablation (CA) of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) from the epicardial left ventricular summit is challenging. The endocardial approach targets two sites: the endocardial closest site (ECS) to the epicardial earliest activation site (epi-EAS) and the endocardial earliest activation site (endo-EAS). We aimed to differentiate between cases where CA at the ECS was effective and where CA at the endo-EAS yielded success.
Methods and results
Fifty-eight patients (47 men; age 60 ± 13 years) were analysed with VAs in which the EAS was observed in the coronary venous system (CVS). Overall, VAs were successfully eliminated in 42 (72%) patients: 8 in the CVS, 8 where the ECS matched with the endo-EAS, 11 at the ECS, and 15 at the endo-EAS. A successful ECS ablation was associated with a shorter epi-EAS–ECS distance (10.2 ± 4.7 vs. 18.8 ± 5.3 mm; P < 0.001) and shorter epi-EAS–left main coronary trunk (LMT) ostial distance (20.3 ± 7.6 vs. 30.3 ± 8.4 mm; P = 0.005), with optimal cut-off values of ≤12.6 and ≤24.0 mm, respectively. A successful endo-EAS ablation was associated with an earlier electrogram at the endo-EAS [23 (8, 36) vs. 15 (0, 19) ms preceding the QRS; P < 0.001] and shorter epi-EAS–endo-EAS interval [6 (1, 8) vs. 22 (12, 25) ms; P < 0.001], with optimal cut-off values of ≥18 and ≤9 ms, respectively.
Conclusion
Shorter anatomical distances between the epi-EAS and ECS, and between the epi-EAS and LMT ostium, predict a successful ECS ablation. The prematurity of the endo-EAS electrogram and a shorter interval between the epi-EAS and endo-EAS predicted a successful endo-EAS ablation.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
The estimated mechanisms underlying the successful ablation of (A) the ECS and (B) endo-EAS. The anatomical distances between the epi-EAS and ECS of ≤12.6 mm and between the epi-EAS and LMT ostium of ≤24.0 mm are the determinants of a successful ablation at the ECS. The electrogram at the endo-EAS preceding the QRS by ≥18 ms and the interval of the electrograms between the epi-EAS and endo-EAS of ≤9 ms are the determinants for a successful ablation at the endo-EAS. The details are described in the Discussion. The abbreviations are as shown in Figure 3. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1099-5129 1532-2092 1532-2092 |
DOI: | 10.1093/europace/euae278 |