Second-dose intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase in alteplase-resistant medium-vessel-occlusion strokes: A retrospective and comparative study

Introduction: In intracranial medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) shows inconsistent effectiveness and endovascular interventions remains unproven. We evaluated a new therapeutic strategy based on a second IVT using tenecteplase for MeVOs without early recanalization pos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European stroke journal 2024-12, Vol.9 (4), p.943-951
Hauptverfasser: Chausson, Nicolas, Olindo, Stéphane, Laborne, François-Xavier, Aghasaryan, Manvel, Renou, Pauline, Soumah, Djibril, Debruxelles, Sabrina, Altarcha, Tony, Poli, Mathilde, L’Hermitte, Yann, Sagnier, Sharmila, Toudou-Daouda, Moussa, Aminou-Tassiou, Nana Rahamatou, Bentamra, Leila, Benmoussa, Narimane, Alecu, Cosmin, Imbernon, Carole, Smadja, Léonard, Ouanounou, Gary, Rouanet, François, Sibon, Igor, Smadja, Didier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: In intracranial medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) shows inconsistent effectiveness and endovascular interventions remains unproven. We evaluated a new therapeutic strategy based on a second IVT using tenecteplase for MeVOs without early recanalization post-alteplase. Patients and methods: This retrospective, comparative study included consecutively low bleeding risk MeVO patients treated with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg at two stroke centers. One center used a conventional single-IVT approach; the other applied a dual-IVT strategy, incorporating a 1-h post-alteplase MRI and additional tenecteplase, 0.25 mg/kg, if occlusion persisted. Primary outcomes were 24-h successful recanalization for efficacy and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) for safety. Secondary outcomes included 3-month excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1). Comparisons were conducted in the overall cohort and a propensity score-matched subgroup. Results: Among 146 patients in the dual-IVT group, 103 failed to achieve recanalization at 1 h and of these 96 met all eligible criteria and received additional tenecteplase. Successful recanalization at 24 h was higher in the 146 dual-IVT cohort patients than in the 148 single-IVT cohort patients (84% vs 61%, p 
ISSN:2396-9873
2396-9881
2396-9881
DOI:10.1177/23969873241254936