Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic

Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Multiple sclerosis 2024-11, Vol.30 (13), p.1620-1629
Hauptverfasser: van Lierop, Zoë YGJ, Wessels, Mark HJ, Lekranty, Womei ML, Moraal, Bastiaan, Hof, Sam N, Hogenboom, Laura, de Jong, Brigit A, Meijs, Nandi, Mensing, Liselore A, van Oosten, Bob W, Sol, Nik, van Kempen, Zoé LE, Vermunt, Lisa, Willems, Myrthe J, Strijbis, Eva MM, Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ, Killestein, Joep, Teunissen, Charlotte E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1629
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1620
container_title Multiple sclerosis
container_volume 30
creator van Lierop, Zoë YGJ
Wessels, Mark HJ
Lekranty, Womei ML
Moraal, Bastiaan
Hof, Sam N
Hogenboom, Laura
de Jong, Brigit A
Meijs, Nandi
Mensing, Liselore A
van Oosten, Bob W
Sol, Nik
van Kempen, Zoé LE
Vermunt, Lisa
Willems, Myrthe J
Strijbis, Eva MM
Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ
Killestein, Joep
Teunissen, Charlotte E
description Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic. Methods: sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL. Results: sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02). Conclusion: In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings
doi_str_mv 10.1177/13524585241277044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11568682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_13524585241277044</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3129227279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-697ff30c5537ef894da01123a6e08944e7ab2a9dad80f35908d488658abc66603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcluFDEQhi0EIhsPwAVZ4sKlE-_LCaEIQqRIuZCzVeN2Txy57cHuRuLtcTRD2MTFi-qrv_6qQug1JeeUan1BuWRCmn5QpjUR4hk6pkLrgVhNnvd3jw-PwBE6ae2BEKI1ly_REbeCEanFMYLreQd-wWXCLdR1xjmstUwxwRzyglPc3vdgxj7FHD0kPAYfWyy54Zgx4CXUJUL9juc1LXGXAm4-hVpabIecM_RigtTCq8N9iu4-ffxy-Xm4ub26vvxwM3gu7DIoq6eJEy8l12EyVoxAKGUcVCD9J4KGDQM7wmjIxKUlZhTGKGlg45VShJ-i93vd3bqZw-i7_QrJ7Wqcuz9XILo_Izneu2355iiVyijDusK7g0ItX9fQFjfH5kNKkENZm-N96NYaKVRH3_6FPpS15t5fp5hlTDNtO0X3lO8DaTVMT24ocY8bdP9ssOe8-b2Np4yfK-vA-R5osA2_yv5f8QcraqRK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3129227279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ ; Wessels, Mark HJ ; Lekranty, Womei ML ; Moraal, Bastiaan ; Hof, Sam N ; Hogenboom, Laura ; de Jong, Brigit A ; Meijs, Nandi ; Mensing, Liselore A ; van Oosten, Bob W ; Sol, Nik ; van Kempen, Zoé LE ; Vermunt, Lisa ; Willems, Myrthe J ; Strijbis, Eva MM ; Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ ; Killestein, Joep ; Teunissen, Charlotte E</creator><creatorcontrib>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ ; Wessels, Mark HJ ; Lekranty, Womei ML ; Moraal, Bastiaan ; Hof, Sam N ; Hogenboom, Laura ; de Jong, Brigit A ; Meijs, Nandi ; Mensing, Liselore A ; van Oosten, Bob W ; Sol, Nik ; van Kempen, Zoé LE ; Vermunt, Lisa ; Willems, Myrthe J ; Strijbis, Eva MM ; Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ ; Killestein, Joep ; Teunissen, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic. Methods: sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL. Results: sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p &lt; 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02). Conclusion: In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-4585</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1477-0970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/13524585241277044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39420574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers - blood ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Decision making ; Differential diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - blood ; Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging ; Neurofilament Proteins - blood ; Original Research Papers ; Questionnaires ; Tertiary Care Centers</subject><ispartof>Multiple sclerosis, 2024-11, Vol.30 (13), p.1620-1629</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2024 2024 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-697ff30c5537ef894da01123a6e08944e7ab2a9dad80f35908d488658abc66603</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2324-0499 ; 0000-0003-3200-8966 ; 0000-0002-0453-6449 ; 0009-0005-1230-1366 ; 0000-0001-6705-5864 ; 0000-0001-9557-5381</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13524585241277044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13524585241277044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39420574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Mark HJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekranty, Womei ML</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraal, Bastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Sam N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogenboom, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Brigit A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijs, Nandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensing, Liselore A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oosten, Bob W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sol, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kempen, Zoé LE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermunt, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willems, Myrthe J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strijbis, Eva MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killestein, Joep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic</title><title>Multiple sclerosis</title><addtitle>Mult Scler</addtitle><description>Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic. Methods: sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL. Results: sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p &lt; 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02). Conclusion: In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Differential diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - blood</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neurofilament Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Original Research Papers</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><issn>1352-4585</issn><issn>1477-0970</issn><issn>1477-0970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcluFDEQhi0EIhsPwAVZ4sKlE-_LCaEIQqRIuZCzVeN2Txy57cHuRuLtcTRD2MTFi-qrv_6qQug1JeeUan1BuWRCmn5QpjUR4hk6pkLrgVhNnvd3jw-PwBE6ae2BEKI1ly_REbeCEanFMYLreQd-wWXCLdR1xjmstUwxwRzyglPc3vdgxj7FHD0kPAYfWyy54Zgx4CXUJUL9juc1LXGXAm4-hVpabIecM_RigtTCq8N9iu4-ffxy-Xm4ub26vvxwM3gu7DIoq6eJEy8l12EyVoxAKGUcVCD9J4KGDQM7wmjIxKUlZhTGKGlg45VShJ-i93vd3bqZw-i7_QrJ7Wqcuz9XILo_Izneu2355iiVyijDusK7g0ItX9fQFjfH5kNKkENZm-N96NYaKVRH3_6FPpS15t5fp5hlTDNtO0X3lO8DaTVMT24ocY8bdP9ssOe8-b2Np4yfK-vA-R5osA2_yv5f8QcraqRK</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ</creator><creator>Wessels, Mark HJ</creator><creator>Lekranty, Womei ML</creator><creator>Moraal, Bastiaan</creator><creator>Hof, Sam N</creator><creator>Hogenboom, Laura</creator><creator>de Jong, Brigit A</creator><creator>Meijs, Nandi</creator><creator>Mensing, Liselore A</creator><creator>van Oosten, Bob W</creator><creator>Sol, Nik</creator><creator>van Kempen, Zoé LE</creator><creator>Vermunt, Lisa</creator><creator>Willems, Myrthe J</creator><creator>Strijbis, Eva MM</creator><creator>Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ</creator><creator>Killestein, Joep</creator><creator>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-0499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-8966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-6449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1230-1366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-5864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-5381</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic</title><author>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ ; Wessels, Mark HJ ; Lekranty, Womei ML ; Moraal, Bastiaan ; Hof, Sam N ; Hogenboom, Laura ; de Jong, Brigit A ; Meijs, Nandi ; Mensing, Liselore A ; van Oosten, Bob W ; Sol, Nik ; van Kempen, Zoé LE ; Vermunt, Lisa ; Willems, Myrthe J ; Strijbis, Eva MM ; Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ ; Killestein, Joep ; Teunissen, Charlotte E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-697ff30c5537ef894da01123a6e08944e7ab2a9dad80f35908d488658abc66603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Differential diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - blood</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neurofilament Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Original Research Papers</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Mark HJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekranty, Womei ML</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraal, Bastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Sam N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogenboom, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Brigit A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijs, Nandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensing, Liselore A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oosten, Bob W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sol, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kempen, Zoé LE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermunt, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willems, Myrthe J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strijbis, Eva MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killestein, Joep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Multiple sclerosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ</au><au>Wessels, Mark HJ</au><au>Lekranty, Womei ML</au><au>Moraal, Bastiaan</au><au>Hof, Sam N</au><au>Hogenboom, Laura</au><au>de Jong, Brigit A</au><au>Meijs, Nandi</au><au>Mensing, Liselore A</au><au>van Oosten, Bob W</au><au>Sol, Nik</au><au>van Kempen, Zoé LE</au><au>Vermunt, Lisa</au><au>Willems, Myrthe J</au><au>Strijbis, Eva MM</au><au>Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ</au><au>Killestein, Joep</au><au>Teunissen, Charlotte E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic</atitle><jtitle>Multiple sclerosis</jtitle><addtitle>Mult Scler</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1620</spage><epage>1629</epage><pages>1620-1629</pages><issn>1352-4585</issn><issn>1477-0970</issn><eissn>1477-0970</eissn><abstract>Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic. Methods: sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL. Results: sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p &lt; 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02). Conclusion: In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39420574</pmid><doi>10.1177/13524585241277044</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-0499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-8966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-6449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1230-1366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-5864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-5381</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-4585
ispartof Multiple sclerosis, 2024-11, Vol.30 (13), p.1620-1629
issn 1352-4585
1477-0970
1477-0970
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11568682
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Biomarkers - blood
Clinical Decision-Making
Decision making
Differential diagnosis
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis - blood
Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging
Neurofilament Proteins - blood
Original Research Papers
Questionnaires
Tertiary Care Centers
title Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A32%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20serum%20neurofilament%20light%20on%20clinical%20decisions%20in%20a%20tertiary%20multiple%20sclerosis%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Multiple%20sclerosis&rft.au=van%20Lierop,%20Zo%C3%AB%20YGJ&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1620&rft.epage=1629&rft.pages=1620-1629&rft.issn=1352-4585&rft.eissn=1477-0970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/13524585241277044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3129227279%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3129227279&rft_id=info:pmid/39420574&rft_sage_id=10.1177_13524585241277044&rfr_iscdi=true