Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic
Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multiple sclerosis 2024-11, Vol.30 (13), p.1620-1629 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1629 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 1620 |
container_title | Multiple sclerosis |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | van Lierop, Zoë YGJ Wessels, Mark HJ Lekranty, Womei ML Moraal, Bastiaan Hof, Sam N Hogenboom, Laura de Jong, Brigit A Meijs, Nandi Mensing, Liselore A van Oosten, Bob W Sol, Nik van Kempen, Zoé LE Vermunt, Lisa Willems, Myrthe J Strijbis, Eva MM Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ Killestein, Joep Teunissen, Charlotte E |
description | Background and objectives:
Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic.
Methods:
sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL.
Results:
sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02).
Conclusion:
In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/13524585241277044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11568682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_13524585241277044</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3129227279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-697ff30c5537ef894da01123a6e08944e7ab2a9dad80f35908d488658abc66603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcluFDEQhi0EIhsPwAVZ4sKlE-_LCaEIQqRIuZCzVeN2Txy57cHuRuLtcTRD2MTFi-qrv_6qQug1JeeUan1BuWRCmn5QpjUR4hk6pkLrgVhNnvd3jw-PwBE6ae2BEKI1ly_REbeCEanFMYLreQd-wWXCLdR1xjmstUwxwRzyglPc3vdgxj7FHD0kPAYfWyy54Zgx4CXUJUL9juc1LXGXAm4-hVpabIecM_RigtTCq8N9iu4-ffxy-Xm4ub26vvxwM3gu7DIoq6eJEy8l12EyVoxAKGUcVCD9J4KGDQM7wmjIxKUlZhTGKGlg45VShJ-i93vd3bqZw-i7_QrJ7Wqcuz9XILo_Izneu2355iiVyijDusK7g0ItX9fQFjfH5kNKkENZm-N96NYaKVRH3_6FPpS15t5fp5hlTDNtO0X3lO8DaTVMT24ocY8bdP9ssOe8-b2Np4yfK-vA-R5osA2_yv5f8QcraqRK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3129227279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ ; Wessels, Mark HJ ; Lekranty, Womei ML ; Moraal, Bastiaan ; Hof, Sam N ; Hogenboom, Laura ; de Jong, Brigit A ; Meijs, Nandi ; Mensing, Liselore A ; van Oosten, Bob W ; Sol, Nik ; van Kempen, Zoé LE ; Vermunt, Lisa ; Willems, Myrthe J ; Strijbis, Eva MM ; Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ ; Killestein, Joep ; Teunissen, Charlotte E</creator><creatorcontrib>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ ; Wessels, Mark HJ ; Lekranty, Womei ML ; Moraal, Bastiaan ; Hof, Sam N ; Hogenboom, Laura ; de Jong, Brigit A ; Meijs, Nandi ; Mensing, Liselore A ; van Oosten, Bob W ; Sol, Nik ; van Kempen, Zoé LE ; Vermunt, Lisa ; Willems, Myrthe J ; Strijbis, Eva MM ; Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ ; Killestein, Joep ; Teunissen, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objectives:
Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic.
Methods:
sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL.
Results:
sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02).
Conclusion:
In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-4585</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1477-0970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/13524585241277044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39420574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers - blood ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Decision making ; Differential diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - blood ; Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging ; Neurofilament Proteins - blood ; Original Research Papers ; Questionnaires ; Tertiary Care Centers</subject><ispartof>Multiple sclerosis, 2024-11, Vol.30 (13), p.1620-1629</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2024 2024 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-697ff30c5537ef894da01123a6e08944e7ab2a9dad80f35908d488658abc66603</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2324-0499 ; 0000-0003-3200-8966 ; 0000-0002-0453-6449 ; 0009-0005-1230-1366 ; 0000-0001-6705-5864 ; 0000-0001-9557-5381</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13524585241277044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13524585241277044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39420574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Mark HJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekranty, Womei ML</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraal, Bastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Sam N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogenboom, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Brigit A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijs, Nandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensing, Liselore A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oosten, Bob W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sol, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kempen, Zoé LE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermunt, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willems, Myrthe J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strijbis, Eva MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killestein, Joep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic</title><title>Multiple sclerosis</title><addtitle>Mult Scler</addtitle><description>Background and objectives:
Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic.
Methods:
sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL.
Results:
sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02).
Conclusion:
In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Differential diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - blood</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neurofilament Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Original Research Papers</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><issn>1352-4585</issn><issn>1477-0970</issn><issn>1477-0970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcluFDEQhi0EIhsPwAVZ4sKlE-_LCaEIQqRIuZCzVeN2Txy57cHuRuLtcTRD2MTFi-qrv_6qQug1JeeUan1BuWRCmn5QpjUR4hk6pkLrgVhNnvd3jw-PwBE6ae2BEKI1ly_REbeCEanFMYLreQd-wWXCLdR1xjmstUwxwRzyglPc3vdgxj7FHD0kPAYfWyy54Zgx4CXUJUL9juc1LXGXAm4-hVpabIecM_RigtTCq8N9iu4-ffxy-Xm4ub26vvxwM3gu7DIoq6eJEy8l12EyVoxAKGUcVCD9J4KGDQM7wmjIxKUlZhTGKGlg45VShJ-i93vd3bqZw-i7_QrJ7Wqcuz9XILo_Izneu2355iiVyijDusK7g0ItX9fQFjfH5kNKkENZm-N96NYaKVRH3_6FPpS15t5fp5hlTDNtO0X3lO8DaTVMT24ocY8bdP9ssOe8-b2Np4yfK-vA-R5osA2_yv5f8QcraqRK</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ</creator><creator>Wessels, Mark HJ</creator><creator>Lekranty, Womei ML</creator><creator>Moraal, Bastiaan</creator><creator>Hof, Sam N</creator><creator>Hogenboom, Laura</creator><creator>de Jong, Brigit A</creator><creator>Meijs, Nandi</creator><creator>Mensing, Liselore A</creator><creator>van Oosten, Bob W</creator><creator>Sol, Nik</creator><creator>van Kempen, Zoé LE</creator><creator>Vermunt, Lisa</creator><creator>Willems, Myrthe J</creator><creator>Strijbis, Eva MM</creator><creator>Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ</creator><creator>Killestein, Joep</creator><creator>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-0499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-8966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-6449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1230-1366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-5864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-5381</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic</title><author>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ ; Wessels, Mark HJ ; Lekranty, Womei ML ; Moraal, Bastiaan ; Hof, Sam N ; Hogenboom, Laura ; de Jong, Brigit A ; Meijs, Nandi ; Mensing, Liselore A ; van Oosten, Bob W ; Sol, Nik ; van Kempen, Zoé LE ; Vermunt, Lisa ; Willems, Myrthe J ; Strijbis, Eva MM ; Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ ; Killestein, Joep ; Teunissen, Charlotte E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-697ff30c5537ef894da01123a6e08944e7ab2a9dad80f35908d488658abc66603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Differential diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - blood</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neurofilament Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Original Research Papers</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Mark HJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekranty, Womei ML</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraal, Bastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Sam N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogenboom, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Brigit A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijs, Nandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mensing, Liselore A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oosten, Bob W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sol, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kempen, Zoé LE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermunt, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willems, Myrthe J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strijbis, Eva MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killestein, Joep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teunissen, Charlotte E</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Multiple sclerosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Lierop, Zoë YGJ</au><au>Wessels, Mark HJ</au><au>Lekranty, Womei ML</au><au>Moraal, Bastiaan</au><au>Hof, Sam N</au><au>Hogenboom, Laura</au><au>de Jong, Brigit A</au><au>Meijs, Nandi</au><au>Mensing, Liselore A</au><au>van Oosten, Bob W</au><au>Sol, Nik</au><au>van Kempen, Zoé LE</au><au>Vermunt, Lisa</au><au>Willems, Myrthe J</au><au>Strijbis, Eva MM</au><au>Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ</au><au>Killestein, Joep</au><au>Teunissen, Charlotte E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic</atitle><jtitle>Multiple sclerosis</jtitle><addtitle>Mult Scler</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1620</spage><epage>1629</epage><pages>1620-1629</pages><issn>1352-4585</issn><issn>1477-0970</issn><eissn>1477-0970</eissn><abstract>Background and objectives:
Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic.
Methods:
sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL.
Results:
sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02).
Conclusion:
In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39420574</pmid><doi>10.1177/13524585241277044</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-0499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-8966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-6449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1230-1366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-5864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-5381</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1352-4585 |
ispartof | Multiple sclerosis, 2024-11, Vol.30 (13), p.1620-1629 |
issn | 1352-4585 1477-0970 1477-0970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11568682 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Biomarkers - blood Clinical Decision-Making Decision making Differential diagnosis Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Middle Aged Multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis - blood Multiple Sclerosis - diagnostic imaging Neurofilament Proteins - blood Original Research Papers Questionnaires Tertiary Care Centers |
title | Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A32%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20serum%20neurofilament%20light%20on%20clinical%20decisions%20in%20a%20tertiary%20multiple%20sclerosis%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Multiple%20sclerosis&rft.au=van%20Lierop,%20Zo%C3%AB%20YGJ&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1620&rft.epage=1629&rft.pages=1620-1629&rft.issn=1352-4585&rft.eissn=1477-0970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/13524585241277044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3129227279%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3129227279&rft_id=info:pmid/39420574&rft_sage_id=10.1177_13524585241277044&rfr_iscdi=true |