Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic

Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Multiple sclerosis 2024-11, Vol.30 (13), p.1620-1629
Hauptverfasser: van Lierop, Zoë YGJ, Wessels, Mark HJ, Lekranty, Womei ML, Moraal, Bastiaan, Hof, Sam N, Hogenboom, Laura, de Jong, Brigit A, Meijs, Nandi, Mensing, Liselore A, van Oosten, Bob W, Sol, Nik, van Kempen, Zoé LE, Vermunt, Lisa, Willems, Myrthe J, Strijbis, Eva MM, Uitdehaag, Bernard MJ, Killestein, Joep, Teunissen, Charlotte E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic. Methods: sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021–December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL. Results: sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: “DMT monitoring” (55%), “new symptoms” (18%), “differential diagnosis” (17%), and “DMT baseline” (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context “new symptoms” (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased (p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels (p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context “differential diagnosis” (p < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context “new symptoms” (p = 0.02). Conclusion: In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings
ISSN:1352-4585
1477-0970
1477-0970
DOI:10.1177/13524585241277044