Effectiveness of a virtual quality improvement training program to improve reach of weight management programs within a large health system
Objective To test effectiveness of the LEAP (Learn Engage Act Process) Program on engaging frontline Veteran Health Administration (VHA) medical center teams in continuous quality improvement (QI), a core capability for learning health systems. Data Sources and Study Setting Data sources included VH...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health services research 2024-12, Vol.59 (S2), p.e14344-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To test effectiveness of the LEAP (Learn Engage Act Process) Program on engaging frontline Veteran Health Administration (VHA) medical center teams in continuous quality improvement (QI), a core capability for learning health systems.
Data Sources and Study Setting
Data sources included VHA electronic health record (EHR) data, surveys, and LEAP coaching field notes.
Study Design
A staggered difference‐in‐differences study was conducted. Fifty‐five facilities participated in LEAP across eight randomly assigned clusters of 6–8 facilities per cluster over 2 years. Non‐participating facilities were used as controls. A MOVE! weight management program team completed a Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act cycle of change supported by learning curriculum, coaching, and virtual collaboratives in LEAP facilities. Primary outcome was program reach to Veterans. A mixed‐effects model compared pre‐ versus post‐LEAP periods for LEAP versus control facilities. LEAP adherence, satisfaction, and cost to deliver LEAP were evaluated.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Thirty months of facility‐level EHR MOVE! enrollment data were included in analyses. LEAP Satisfaction and QI skills were elicited via surveys at baseline and 6‐month post‐LEAP.
Principal findings
Fifty‐five facilities were randomly assigned to eight time‐period‐based clusters to receive LEAP (71% completed LEAP) and 82 non‐participating facilities were randomly assigned as controls. Reach in LEAP and control facilities was comparable in the 12‐month pre‐LEAP period (p = 0.07). Though LEAP facilities experienced slower decline in reach in the 12‐month post‐LEAP period compared with controls (p 4 on a 5‐point scale), self‐reported use of QI methods increased significantly (p‐values |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-9124 1475-6773 1475-6773 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1475-6773.14344 |