Comparing transplant outcomes in ALL patients after myeloablative conditioning in mismatch-related or unrelated donor settings
The optimal myeloablative conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with an alternative donor is unknown. We analyzed HCT outcomes ALL patients ( n = 269) who underwent HCT at our center from 2010 to 2020 in complete remission (CR) after FTBI-etoposide and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2024-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1542-1551 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The optimal myeloablative conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with an alternative donor is unknown. We analyzed HCT outcomes ALL patients (
n
= 269) who underwent HCT at our center from 2010 to 2020 in complete remission (CR) after FTBI-etoposide and CNI-based GvHD prophylaxis for matched donor HCT (ETOP-package;
n
= 196) or FTBI-Fludarabine and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis for HLA- mismatched (related or unrelated) donors (FLU-package;
n
= 64). Patients in FLU-package showed a significant delay in engraftment (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-3369 1476-5365 1476-5365 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41409-024-02378-0 |