Comparing transplant outcomes in ALL patients after myeloablative conditioning in mismatch-related or unrelated donor settings

The optimal myeloablative conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with an alternative donor is unknown. We analyzed HCT outcomes ALL patients ( n  = 269) who underwent HCT at our center from 2010 to 2020 in complete remission (CR) after FTBI-etoposide and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2024-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1542-1551
Hauptverfasser: Otoukesh, Salman, Yang, Dongyun, Mokhtari, Sally, Pourhassan, Hoda, Agrawal, Vaibhav, Arslan, Shukaib, Amanam, Idoroenyi, Ball, Brian, Koller, Paul, Salhotra, Amandeep, Sandhu, Karamjeet, Aribi, Ahmed, Artz, Andrew, Aldoss, Ibrahim, Pullarkat, Vinod, Ali, Haris, Blackmon, Amanda, Becker, Pamela, Curtin, Peter, Stewart, Forrest, Smith, Eileen, Stein, Anthony, Marcucci, Guido, Forman, Stephen J., Nakamura, Ryotaro, Al Malki, Monzr M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The optimal myeloablative conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with an alternative donor is unknown. We analyzed HCT outcomes ALL patients ( n  = 269) who underwent HCT at our center from 2010 to 2020 in complete remission (CR) after FTBI-etoposide and CNI-based GvHD prophylaxis for matched donor HCT (ETOP-package; n  = 196) or FTBI-Fludarabine and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis for HLA- mismatched (related or unrelated) donors (FLU-package; n  = 64). Patients in FLU-package showed a significant delay in engraftment ( p  
ISSN:0268-3369
1476-5365
1476-5365
DOI:10.1038/s41409-024-02378-0