Intrasaccular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Review
: The endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, such as wide-neck aneurysms (WNAs), remains a challenge. More established endovascular techniques, which include balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, and flow diversion, all have their drawbacks. Intrasaccular flow disrupto...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2024-10, Vol.13 (20), p.6162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | : The endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, such as wide-neck aneurysms (WNAs), remains a challenge. More established endovascular techniques, which include balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, and flow diversion, all have their drawbacks. Intrasaccular flow disruptor devices have emerged as a useful tool for the neurointerventionalist.
: Here, we discuss landmark studies and provide a comprehensive, narrative review of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB; Microvention, Alisa Viejo, CA, USA), Artisse (Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA), Contour (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), Saccular Endovascular Aneurysm Lattice Embolization System (SEAL; Galaxy Therapeutics Inc, Milpitas, CA, USA), Medina (Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA), and Trenza (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) devices.
: Intrasaccular devices have proven to be effective in treating complex aneurysms like WNAs.
: Intrasaccular flow disruptors have emerged as a new class of effective endovascular therapy, and results of ongoing clinical studies for the newer devices (e.g., SEAL and Trenza) are much anticipated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
DOI: | 10.3390/jcm13206162 |