Applications of artificial intelligence for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: mapping the evidence

Purpose Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common spinal deformity with varying progression, complicating treatment decisions. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly prominent in orthopedic care, aiding in diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment guidanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine deformity 2024-11, Vol.12 (6), p.1545-1570
Hauptverfasser: Goldman, Samuel N., Hui, Aaron T., Choi, Sharlene, Mbamalu, Emmanuel K., Tirabady, Parsa, Eleswarapu, Ananth S., Gomez, Jaime A., Alvandi, Leila M., Fornari, Eric D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common spinal deformity with varying progression, complicating treatment decisions. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly prominent in orthopedic care, aiding in diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment guidance. This scoping review outlines AI applications in AIS. Methods This study followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included articles that reported the development, use, or validation of AI models for treating, diagnosing, or predicting clinical outcomes in AIS. Results 40 full-text articles were included, with most studies published in the last 5 years (77.5%). Common ML techniques were convolutional neural networks (55%), decision trees and random forests (15%), and artificial neural networks (15%). Most AI applications in AIS were for imaging analysis (25/40; 62.5%), focusing on automatic measurement of Cobb angle, and axial vertebral rotation (13/25; 52%) and curve classification/severity (13/25; 52%). Prediction was the second most common application (15/40; 37.5%), with studies predicting curve progression (9/15; 60%), and Cobb angles (9/15; 60%). Only 15 studies (37.5%) reported clinical implementation guidelines for AI in AIS management. 52.5% of studies reported model accuracy, with an average of 85.4%. Conclusion This review highlights the applications of AI in AIS care, notably including automatic radiographic analysis, curve type classification, prediction of curve progression, and AIS diagnosis. However, the current lack of clear clinical implementation guidelines, model transparency, and external validation of studied models limits clinician trust and the generalizability and applicability of AI in AIS management.
ISSN:2212-134X
2212-1358
2212-1358
DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00940-w