Selective FFRCT testing in suspected stable angina in clinical practice - initial experiences

Coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) is recommended for physiological assessment in intermediate coronary stenosis for guiding referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). In this study, we report real-world data on the feasibility of implementing a CTA/FFR CT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2024-10, Vol.40 (10), p.2213-2220
Hauptverfasser: Thangavel, Shifan, Madsen, Kristian Taekker, Rønnow Sand, Niels Peter, Veien, Karsten Tange, Deibjerg, Lone, Husain, Majed, Hosbond, Susanne, Alan, Dilek Hunerel, Øvrehus, Kristian Altern, Junker, Anders, Mortensen, Jonas, Thomsen, Kristian Korsgaard, Jensen, Lisette Okkels, Poulsen, Tina Svenstrup, Steffensen, Flemming Hald, Rohold, Allan, Busk, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) is recommended for physiological assessment in intermediate coronary stenosis for guiding referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). In this study, we report real-world data on the feasibility of implementing a CTA/FFR CT test algorithm as a gatekeeper to ICA at referral hospitals. Retrospective all-comer study of patients with new onset stable symptoms and suspected coronary stenosis (30–89%) by CTA. Evaluation of CTA datasets, interpretation of FFR CT analysis, and decisions on downstream testing were performed by skilled CT-cardiologists. CTA was performed in 3974 patients, of whom 381 (10%) were referred directly to ICA, whereas 463 (12%) to non-invasive functional testing: FFR CT 375 (81%) and perfusion imaging 88 (19%). FFR CT analysis was rejected in 8 (2%) due to inadequate CTA image quality. Number of patients deferred from ICA after FFR CT was 267 (71%), while 100 (27%) were referred to ICA. Obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was confirmed in 62 (62%) patients and revascularization performed in 53 (53%). Revascularization rates, n (%), were higher in patients undergoing FFR CT -guided versus CTA-guided referral to ICA: 30–69% stenosis, 28 (44%) versus 8 (21%); 70–89% stenosis, 39 (69%) versus 25 (46%), respectively, both p  
ISSN:1875-8312
1569-5794
1875-8312
1573-0743
DOI:10.1007/s10554-024-03214-8