Selective FFRCT testing in suspected stable angina in clinical practice - initial experiences
Coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) is recommended for physiological assessment in intermediate coronary stenosis for guiding referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). In this study, we report real-world data on the feasibility of implementing a CTA/FFR CT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2024-10, Vol.40 (10), p.2213-2220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR
CT
) is recommended for physiological assessment in intermediate coronary stenosis for guiding referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). In this study, we report real-world data on the feasibility of implementing a CTA/FFR
CT
test algorithm as a gatekeeper to ICA at referral hospitals. Retrospective all-comer study of patients with new onset stable symptoms and suspected coronary stenosis (30–89%) by CTA. Evaluation of CTA datasets, interpretation of FFR
CT
analysis, and decisions on downstream testing were performed by skilled CT-cardiologists. CTA was performed in 3974 patients, of whom 381 (10%) were referred directly to ICA, whereas 463 (12%) to non-invasive functional testing: FFR
CT
375 (81%) and perfusion imaging 88 (19%). FFR
CT
analysis was rejected in 8 (2%) due to inadequate CTA image quality. Number of patients deferred from ICA after FFR
CT
was 267 (71%), while 100 (27%) were referred to ICA. Obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was confirmed in 62 (62%) patients and revascularization performed in 53 (53%). Revascularization rates, n (%), were higher in patients undergoing FFR
CT
-guided versus CTA-guided referral to ICA: 30–69% stenosis, 28 (44%) versus 8 (21%); 70–89% stenosis, 39 (69%) versus 25 (46%), respectively, both
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1875-8312 1569-5794 1875-8312 1573-0743 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10554-024-03214-8 |