Bladder Cancer detection by urinary methylation markers GHSR/MAL: a validation study

Purpose Although cystoscopy is a reliable tool for detecting bladder cancer, it poses a high burden on patients and entails high costs. This highlights the need for non-invasive and cost-effective alternatives. This study aimed to validate a previously developed urinary methylation marker panel cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2024-10, Vol.42 (1), p.578, Article 578
Hauptverfasser: Beijert, I. J., van den Burgt, Y., Hentschel, A. E., Bosschieter, J., Kauer, P. C., Lissenberg-Witte, B. I., van Moorselaar, R. J.A., Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A., Steenbergen, R. D.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Although cystoscopy is a reliable tool for detecting bladder cancer, it poses a high burden on patients and entails high costs. This highlights the need for non-invasive and cost-effective alternatives. This study aimed to validate a previously developed urinary methylation marker panel containing GHSR and MAL . Methods We enrolled 134 patients who underwent cystoscopy because of hematuria, including 63 individuals with primary bladder cancer and 71 with non-malignant findings. Urine samples were self-collected at home and sent via regular mail. Subsequently, DNA was extracted and the hypermethylation of GHSR and MAL was evaluated using quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The performance of methylation markers was assessed using area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis and sensitivity and specificity based on pre-established cut-off values. Results Validation of the marker panel GHSR/MAL resulted in an AUC of 0.87 at 79% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Sensitivity was comparable to the previous investigation ( P  > 0.9), though specificity was significantly lower ( P  = 0.026). Sensitivity was higher for high-grade tumors compared to low-grade tumors (94% vs. 60%, P  = 0.002). Conclusion Validation of the GHSR/MAL methylation marker panel on at home collected urine samples confirms its robust performance for bladder cancer detection in a hematuria population, and underscores the diagnostic potential for future clinical application.
ISSN:1433-8726
0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05287-5