Professional stigmatizations
After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2024-10, Vol.196 (34), p.E1173-E1175 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E1175 |
---|---|
container_issue | 34 |
container_start_page | E1173 |
container_title | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Neilson, Shane |
description | After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1503/cmaj.241029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11482656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A811945619</galeid><sourcerecordid>A811945619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-dbd23dcad933966bba614924c7d5a22c763f6320d103de8afa17852a5bb5e3fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0u9r1DAYB_AwlO2ce-VbEZkgivTMjzZtXskY_hgMlW2-Dk-Tp70cbXNrWlH_enO7uV3HvbGlBNJPvm3Il5BnjM5ZRsV708JyzlNGudojM5YWRcIFV4_IjBacJkKl8oA8CWFJ4yV4vk8O4hyVccWMPP_e-wpDcL6D5mUYXN3C4P7Ex3fhKXlcQRPw6HY8JD8-fbw6_ZKcf_t8dnpynpiMqyGxpeXCGrBKCCVlWYJkqeKpyW0GnJtcikoKTi2jwmIBFbC8yDhkZZmhqEpxSD5scldj2aI12A09NHrVuxb639qD09M3nVvo2v_ULO6Wy0zGhDe3Cb2_HjEMunXBYNNAh34MWjCW01xQoSJ99YAu_djH3d-oguaS5vRe1dCgdl3l44fNOlSfFIypNJNsnZXsUDV2GP_Sd1i5OD3xxzu8WblrvY3mO1C8LbbO7Ex9O1kQzYC_hhrGEPTZ5cV_2K9T-3rLLhCaYRF8M950YwrfbaDpfQg9VndHx6hed1SvO6o3HY36xfZp39l_pRR_AV2A27w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118076070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Professional stigmatizations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Neilson, Shane</creator><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Shane</creatorcontrib><description>After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.241029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39406410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: CMA Impact Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Autism ; Bipolar disorder ; Canada ; Curricula ; Disability ; Disability discrimination ; Dystopias ; Health aspects ; Humanities ; Humans ; Interviews ; Medical education ; Medical students ; Medicine ; Physicians ; Physicians - psychology ; Psychological aspects ; Social aspects ; Social Stigma ; Stereotyping ; Stigma ; Stigma (Social psychology)</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2024-10, Vol.196 (34), p.E1173-E1175</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 CMA Impact Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright CMA Impact, Inc. Oct 15, 2024</rights><rights>2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482656/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482656/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39406410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Shane</creatorcontrib><title>Professional stigmatizations</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</title><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><description>After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability discrimination</subject><subject>Dystopias</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Stigma (Social psychology)</subject><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqV0u9r1DAYB_AwlO2ce-VbEZkgivTMjzZtXskY_hgMlW2-Dk-Tp70cbXNrWlH_enO7uV3HvbGlBNJPvm3Il5BnjM5ZRsV708JyzlNGudojM5YWRcIFV4_IjBacJkKl8oA8CWFJ4yV4vk8O4hyVccWMPP_e-wpDcL6D5mUYXN3C4P7Ex3fhKXlcQRPw6HY8JD8-fbw6_ZKcf_t8dnpynpiMqyGxpeXCGrBKCCVlWYJkqeKpyW0GnJtcikoKTi2jwmIBFbC8yDhkZZmhqEpxSD5scldj2aI12A09NHrVuxb639qD09M3nVvo2v_ULO6Wy0zGhDe3Cb2_HjEMunXBYNNAh34MWjCW01xQoSJ99YAu_djH3d-oguaS5vRe1dCgdl3l44fNOlSfFIypNJNsnZXsUDV2GP_Sd1i5OD3xxzu8WblrvY3mO1C8LbbO7Ex9O1kQzYC_hhrGEPTZ5cV_2K9T-3rLLhCaYRF8M950YwrfbaDpfQg9VndHx6hed1SvO6o3HY36xfZp39l_pRR_AV2A27w</recordid><startdate>20241015</startdate><enddate>20241015</enddate><creator>Neilson, Shane</creator><general>CMA Impact Inc</general><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241015</creationdate><title>Professional stigmatizations</title><author>Neilson, Shane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-dbd23dcad933966bba614924c7d5a22c763f6320d103de8afa17852a5bb5e3fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability discrimination</topic><topic>Dystopias</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Stigma (Social psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Shane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neilson, Shane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Professional stigmatizations</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><date>2024-10-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>34</issue><spage>E1173</spage><epage>E1175</epage><pages>E1173-E1175</pages><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><abstract>After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>CMA Impact Inc</pub><pmid>39406410</pmid><doi>10.1503/cmaj.241029</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0820-3946 |
ispartof | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2024-10, Vol.196 (34), p.E1173-E1175 |
issn | 0820-3946 1488-2329 1488-2329 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11482656 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis Autism Bipolar disorder Canada Curricula Disability Disability discrimination Dystopias Health aspects Humanities Humans Interviews Medical education Medical students Medicine Physicians Physicians - psychology Psychological aspects Social aspects Social Stigma Stereotyping Stigma Stigma (Social psychology) |
title | Professional stigmatizations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A42%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Professional%20stigmatizations&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal%20(CMAJ)&rft.au=Neilson,%20Shane&rft.date=2024-10-15&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=34&rft.spage=E1173&rft.epage=E1175&rft.pages=E1173-E1175&rft.issn=0820-3946&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1503/cmaj.241029&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA811945619%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118076070&rft_id=info:pmid/39406410&rft_galeid=A811945619&rfr_iscdi=true |