Professional stigmatizations

After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2024-10, Vol.196 (34), p.E1173-E1175
1. Verfasser: Neilson, Shane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E1175
container_issue 34
container_start_page E1173
container_title Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)
container_volume 196
creator Neilson, Shane
description After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical.
doi_str_mv 10.1503/cmaj.241029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11482656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A811945619</galeid><sourcerecordid>A811945619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-dbd23dcad933966bba614924c7d5a22c763f6320d103de8afa17852a5bb5e3fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0u9r1DAYB_AwlO2ce-VbEZkgivTMjzZtXskY_hgMlW2-Dk-Tp70cbXNrWlH_enO7uV3HvbGlBNJPvm3Il5BnjM5ZRsV708JyzlNGudojM5YWRcIFV4_IjBacJkKl8oA8CWFJ4yV4vk8O4hyVccWMPP_e-wpDcL6D5mUYXN3C4P7Ex3fhKXlcQRPw6HY8JD8-fbw6_ZKcf_t8dnpynpiMqyGxpeXCGrBKCCVlWYJkqeKpyW0GnJtcikoKTi2jwmIBFbC8yDhkZZmhqEpxSD5scldj2aI12A09NHrVuxb639qD09M3nVvo2v_ULO6Wy0zGhDe3Cb2_HjEMunXBYNNAh34MWjCW01xQoSJ99YAu_djH3d-oguaS5vRe1dCgdl3l44fNOlSfFIypNJNsnZXsUDV2GP_Sd1i5OD3xxzu8WblrvY3mO1C8LbbO7Ex9O1kQzYC_hhrGEPTZ5cV_2K9T-3rLLhCaYRF8M950YwrfbaDpfQg9VndHx6hed1SvO6o3HY36xfZp39l_pRR_AV2A27w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118076070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Professional stigmatizations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Neilson, Shane</creator><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Shane</creatorcontrib><description>After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.241029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39406410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: CMA Impact Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Autism ; Bipolar disorder ; Canada ; Curricula ; Disability ; Disability discrimination ; Dystopias ; Health aspects ; Humanities ; Humans ; Interviews ; Medical education ; Medical students ; Medicine ; Physicians ; Physicians - psychology ; Psychological aspects ; Social aspects ; Social Stigma ; Stereotyping ; Stigma ; Stigma (Social psychology)</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2024-10, Vol.196 (34), p.E1173-E1175</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 CMA Impact Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright CMA Impact, Inc. Oct 15, 2024</rights><rights>2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482656/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482656/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39406410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Shane</creatorcontrib><title>Professional stigmatizations</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</title><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><description>After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability discrimination</subject><subject>Dystopias</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Stigma (Social psychology)</subject><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqV0u9r1DAYB_AwlO2ce-VbEZkgivTMjzZtXskY_hgMlW2-Dk-Tp70cbXNrWlH_enO7uV3HvbGlBNJPvm3Il5BnjM5ZRsV708JyzlNGudojM5YWRcIFV4_IjBacJkKl8oA8CWFJ4yV4vk8O4hyVccWMPP_e-wpDcL6D5mUYXN3C4P7Ex3fhKXlcQRPw6HY8JD8-fbw6_ZKcf_t8dnpynpiMqyGxpeXCGrBKCCVlWYJkqeKpyW0GnJtcikoKTi2jwmIBFbC8yDhkZZmhqEpxSD5scldj2aI12A09NHrVuxb639qD09M3nVvo2v_ULO6Wy0zGhDe3Cb2_HjEMunXBYNNAh34MWjCW01xQoSJ99YAu_djH3d-oguaS5vRe1dCgdl3l44fNOlSfFIypNJNsnZXsUDV2GP_Sd1i5OD3xxzu8WblrvY3mO1C8LbbO7Ex9O1kQzYC_hhrGEPTZ5cV_2K9T-3rLLhCaYRF8M950YwrfbaDpfQg9VndHx6hed1SvO6o3HY36xfZp39l_pRR_AV2A27w</recordid><startdate>20241015</startdate><enddate>20241015</enddate><creator>Neilson, Shane</creator><general>CMA Impact Inc</general><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241015</creationdate><title>Professional stigmatizations</title><author>Neilson, Shane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-dbd23dcad933966bba614924c7d5a22c763f6320d103de8afa17852a5bb5e3fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability discrimination</topic><topic>Dystopias</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Stigma (Social psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Shane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neilson, Shane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Professional stigmatizations</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><date>2024-10-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>34</issue><spage>E1173</spage><epage>E1175</epage><pages>E1173-E1175</pages><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><abstract>After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>CMA Impact Inc</pub><pmid>39406410</pmid><doi>10.1503/cmaj.241029</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0820-3946
ispartof Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2024-10, Vol.196 (34), p.E1173-E1175
issn 0820-3946
1488-2329
1488-2329
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11482656
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Autism
Bipolar disorder
Canada
Curricula
Disability
Disability discrimination
Dystopias
Health aspects
Humanities
Humans
Interviews
Medical education
Medical students
Medicine
Physicians
Physicians - psychology
Psychological aspects
Social aspects
Social Stigma
Stereotyping
Stigma
Stigma (Social psychology)
title Professional stigmatizations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A42%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Professional%20stigmatizations&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal%20(CMAJ)&rft.au=Neilson,%20Shane&rft.date=2024-10-15&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=34&rft.spage=E1173&rft.epage=E1175&rft.pages=E1173-E1175&rft.issn=0820-3946&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1503/cmaj.241029&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA811945619%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118076070&rft_id=info:pmid/39406410&rft_galeid=A811945619&rfr_iscdi=true