Professional stigmatizations

After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2024-10, Vol.196 (34), p.E1173-E1175
1. Verfasser: Neilson, Shane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical.
ISSN:0820-3946
1488-2329
1488-2329
DOI:10.1503/cmaj.241029