Professional stigmatizations
After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2024-10, Vol.196 (34), p.E1173-E1175 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | After interviewing for medical school across Canada, I am asked to re-interview at Dalhousie University because, I am told, my first attempt "was completely discordant from the letters about your character and your academic performance. Your marks put you close to the top of the applicant pool." I am also told they thought I was aloof. In return, I tell them that, during my first interview, one of the doctors took a consult. For about 10 minutes, he talked on the phone as the other guy whispered his questions, encouraging me to answer, but pushing his hand down when I spoke, as if I should whisper. Two weeks after my re-interview, I receive my offer to Dalhousie. If the procedural botch hadn't happened, and if I hadn't had good references from people with whom I'd built strong relationships over long periods of time, I wouldn't have become a doctor, easily weeded out of an admissions regime hostile to the non-neurotypical. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0820-3946 1488-2329 1488-2329 |
DOI: | 10.1503/cmaj.241029 |