Optimizing Corticosteroid Sinonasal Irrigation Outcomes Through 3D Printing: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial

Topical corticosteroid irrigation plays critical role in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Yet, its efficacy can be highly variable. We sought to determine if personalized, 3-dimensional (3D)-printed nasal models can optimize head positioning and irrigation parameters, therefore improv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:OTO open : the official open access journal of the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2024-10, Vol.8 (4), p.e70036
Hauptverfasser: Root, Zachary T, Lepley, Thomas J, Kim, Kanghyun, Schneller, Aspen R, Zhao, Songzhu, Wen, Raymond, Formanek, Veronica L, Sussman, Sarah M, Lee, Joseph S, Odeh, Ahmad, Wei, Lai, Kelly, Kathleen M, Otto, Bradley A, Zhao, Kai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Topical corticosteroid irrigation plays critical role in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Yet, its efficacy can be highly variable. We sought to determine if personalized, 3-dimensional (3D)-printed nasal models can optimize head positioning and irrigation parameters, therefore improving patient outcomes. Randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Tertiary medical center from November 2021 to July 2023. Sixty-two patients with CRS were randomized into either control (CG), backfill (BG), or model (MG) groups; daily 2 mg mometasone irrigations were then performed for 2 months with either standard head-forward and natural side-tilt position (CG), a head tilt of 90° to the side with fluid entering the lower nostril (BG), or in an optimized position as determined by a patient-specific 3D printed irrigation model (MG), respectively. A total of 36 patients completed the trial (CG: N = 14/23; BG N = 11/23, MG: N = 11/16). Significant posttreatment improvement in Lund-Mackay (LM) scoring was only observed in the MG (-3.73, 95% confidence interval = -5.71, -1.75;  
ISSN:2473-974X
2473-974X
DOI:10.1002/oto2.70036