Meta-Analysis of Age, Sex, and Race Disparities in the Era of Contemporary Urothelial Carcinoma Treatment

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide. However, minority populations, such as female, elder, and Black patients, may have disparate outcomes and are commonly neglected in randomized prospective trials. This review aims to study the relationship between age,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2024-09, Vol.16 (19), p.3338
Hauptverfasser: Barsouk, Adam, Elghawy, Omar, Yang, Austin, Sussman, Jonathan H, Mamtani, Ronac, Mei, Lin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide. However, minority populations, such as female, elder, and Black patients, may have disparate outcomes and are commonly neglected in randomized prospective trials. This review aims to study the relationship between age, sex, and race on urothelial cancer prognosis, particularly focusing on contemporary therapy and its effect on overall survival. Phase III prospective trials since 2016 of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, or targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma were identified from PubMed. Trials that did not report on survival by race, sex, or age distribution were excluded, and remaining trials ( = 17) were compared by subgroup. Women were reported to have inferior OS on investigational agents compared to men in 9/17 trials. In a meta-analysis, women had inferior OS to men (OR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.78-0.99]; = 0.04). Asian/Pacific Islander patients had inferior outcomes to White patients on investigational agents in 3/5 trials. In a meta-analysis, OS was not significant by race (OR 1.18 [0.90-1.46], = 0.38). Black patients composed
ISSN:2072-6694
2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers16193338