Safety and efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for pre-exposure prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Background Immunocompromised patients show an impaired vaccine response and remain at high risk of severe COVID-19, despite vaccination. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed for prophylaxis and treatment. The comb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nephrology 2024-07, Vol.37 (6), p.1539-1550
Hauptverfasser: Simone, Simona, Pronzo, Virginia, Pesce, Francesco, Bavaro, Davide Fiore, Infante, Barbara, Mercuri, Silvia, Schirinzi, Annalisa, Panaro, Antonella, Conte, Eleonora, Belati, Alessandra, Troise, Dario, Pontrelli, Paola, Conserva, Francesca, Gallo, Pasquale, Panico, Maddalena, Spilotros, Marco, Lucarelli, Giuseppe, Saracino, Annalisa, Stallone, Giovanni, Di Serio, Francesca, Ditonno, Pasquale, Gesualdo, Loreto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Immunocompromised patients show an impaired vaccine response and remain at high risk of severe COVID-19, despite vaccination. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed for prophylaxis and treatment. The combination tixagevimab/cilgavimab (AZD7442) has been authorized for emergency use as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19, but data on safety and efficacy in kidney transplant recipients during the Omicron period are limited. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including 253 kidney transplant recipients, of whom 98 were treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab 150 mg/150 mg and 155 who received only four doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Results Only 13.3% of patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection after the administration of tixagevimab/cilgavimab; in comparison, 34.2% of patients had been infected after the fourth dose of vaccine ( p  = 0.00013). Most infected patients in the AZD7442 group remained asymptomatic (92.3% vs 54.7%), 7.7% had mild symptoms and none had severe disease, need for hospitalization or died, while in the control group, 9.4% of patients had moderate or severe disease ( p  = 0.04). Using Kaplan–Meier curves we demonstrated that the controls presented early infection compared to the AZD7442 group ( p  = 0.000014). No changes in eGFR or proteinuria, assessed before and after the administration, were observed. Conclusions In conclusion, our study showed that tixagevimab/cilgavimab 150/150 mg is effective and safe in preventing infection and severe disease when administered to patients with weak or no response to COVID-19 vaccine. Graphical abstract
ISSN:1724-6059
1121-8428
1724-6059
DOI:10.1007/s40620-024-01889-9