The management of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis in different medical settings: Where does that leave us? An Italian nationwide survey

Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FPF) is an emerging group of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) caused by mutations mainly involving "telomere-related genes" and "surfactant-related genes". Although, in 2023, European Respiratory Society proposed a statement for FPFs management, thes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases, 2024-09, Vol.41 (3), p.e2024047
Hauptverfasser: Monteleone, Giorgio, ILDs Study Group Sip/Irs, Bergantini, Laura, D'Alessandro, Miriana, Pianigiani, Tommaso, Simonetti, Jacopo, Iovene, Bruno, Varone, Francesco, Sgalla, Giacomo, Richeldi, Luca, Bargagli, Elena, Cameli, Paolo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FPF) is an emerging group of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) caused by mutations mainly involving "telomere-related genes" and "surfactant-related genes". Although, in 2023, European Respiratory Society proposed a statement for FPFs management, these still remain a burden. Our work aimed to evaluate the management and impact of FPF in three Italian different medical settings: University Hospitals (UHs), non-University Hospitals (N-UHs) and outpatient clinics. This survey was created by ILDs Study Group Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory Society (SIP-IRS) and diffused via email to all SIP-IRS members. The descriptive statistical analysis was conducted through GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0).  Results: Twenty participants replied to the survey, of which 65% (13/20) worked at UH while the remaining 25% (6/20) and 5% (1/20) worked at N-UH and outpatient clinics, respectively. Centers with, at least, 150 ILD patients visits/year followed a higher number of FPF patients, regardless of University affiliation (p=0.0046). Despite significant discrepancies in genetic testing and availability of counselling were registered, no statistically significant differences in patients' anamnesis assessment were observed between UHs and N-UHs (p=0.4192 and p=0.6525). However, there were relevant differences in the number of FPF patients undergoing genetic assessment in the Centers with Genetics Lab or Unit inside the Hospital (p=0.0253). There was no consensus regarding the impact of FPF diagnosis on lung transplantation and screening of asymptomatic relatives. Similarly, no differences were reported in antifibrotic prescriptions between UHs and N-UHs. Although the typical UIP pattern was the most common radiological pattern observed in FPF patients, there were no differences in the prevalence of histopathological patterns between UH and N-UH. Improving pulmonologists' knowledge of the approach, diagnosis and management of FPF is a global medical topic. Scientific societies can provide significant support in raising physicians' awareness of this issue.
ISSN:2532-179X
1124-0490
2532-179X
DOI:10.36141/svdld.v41i3.15744