The relationship between fragility scores and intraoperative body temperature changes in geriatric patients: Prospective observational research

Today, to evaluate morbidity and mortality in elderly surgical patients, fragility scores, which reflect the patient's current condition rather than increasing age, are used as a basis. Our research examines the association between fragility groups, body temperature changes, and inadvertent per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2024-10, Vol.103 (40), p.e39822
Hauptverfasser: Arslan, Fatma Nur, Dagli, Recai, Ceran, Güzin, Horoz, Levent, Türker, Yunus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Today, to evaluate morbidity and mortality in elderly surgical patients, fragility scores, which reflect the patient's current condition rather than increasing age, are used as a basis. Our research examines the association between fragility groups, body temperature changes, and inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH) in major orthopedic surgery patients. Patients over the age of 65 who underwent major orthopedic surgery were evaluated. Body temperature measurements were taken tympanically preoperatively and every 5 minutes during surgery. Temperature changes (Δn) were calculated. Patients whose body temperature was below 36 °C were recorded as IPH. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Clinical Frailty Scale scoring system, consisting of 9 categories, was used for fragility scores. As the category number increases, the level of fragility increases. These categories are classified into 3 subgroups: Group F1 (Level 1-3), Group F2 (Level 4-7), and Group F3 (Level 8-9). Age groups: it is defined as Group A1 (66-74 years), Group A2 (75-84 years), and Group A3 (85
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000039822