Ability of detection in different resolution endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions

Background Most endoscopists believe that higher resolution improves lesion detection rates. However, existing studies primarily compared the detection rates of white light endoscopy (WLE) and other imaging modalities. Our previous study demonstrated the advantages of magnifying endoscopy from gener...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2024-10, Vol.38 (10), p.5903-5913
Hauptverfasser: Jin, Xiaoliang, Zhou, Qiujun, Lyu, Bin, Zhang, Chunli, Huang, Liang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Most endoscopists believe that higher resolution improves lesion detection rates. However, existing studies primarily compared the detection rates of white light endoscopy (WLE) and other imaging modalities. Our previous study demonstrated the advantages of magnifying endoscopy from general endoscopy for lesion detection, prompting further investigation into the variations in lesion detection rates across endoscopes with different resolutions. Methods Endoscopic and corresponding pathological data from our medical unit over the past 5 years were analyzed. We excluded specific-purpose endoscopic procedures to ensure the natural randomization of the data. Baseline adjustment and risk factor analyses used multi-group propensity score matching and logistic regression. Results The overall lesion detection rate was significantly higher with high-quality endoscopy (Q-endoscopy) compared to high-definition endoscopy (H-endoscopy) and high definition and quality endoscopy (HQ-endoscopy) (34.4% vs. 30.2% vs. 29.6%, P  = 0.001). Similar results were observed for elevated lesions (25.7% vs. 21.0% vs. 22.9%, P  = 0.001) and depressed lesions (6.6% vs. 6.2% vs. 3.6%, P  
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11186-y