Ability of detection in different resolution endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions
Background Most endoscopists believe that higher resolution improves lesion detection rates. However, existing studies primarily compared the detection rates of white light endoscopy (WLE) and other imaging modalities. Our previous study demonstrated the advantages of magnifying endoscopy from gener...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2024-10, Vol.38 (10), p.5903-5913 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Most endoscopists believe that higher resolution improves lesion detection rates. However, existing studies primarily compared the detection rates of white light endoscopy (WLE) and other imaging modalities. Our previous study demonstrated the advantages of magnifying endoscopy from general endoscopy for lesion detection, prompting further investigation into the variations in lesion detection rates across endoscopes with different resolutions.
Methods
Endoscopic and corresponding pathological data from our medical unit over the past 5 years were analyzed. We excluded specific-purpose endoscopic procedures to ensure the natural randomization of the data. Baseline adjustment and risk factor analyses used multi-group propensity score matching and logistic regression.
Results
The overall lesion detection rate was significantly higher with high-quality endoscopy (Q-endoscopy) compared to high-definition endoscopy (H-endoscopy) and high definition and quality endoscopy (HQ-endoscopy) (34.4% vs. 30.2% vs. 29.6%,
P
= 0.001). Similar results were observed for elevated lesions (25.7% vs. 21.0% vs. 22.9%,
P
= 0.001) and depressed lesions (6.6% vs. 6.2% vs. 3.6%,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0930-2794 1432-2218 1432-2218 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-024-11186-y |