Comparative Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Two-Layer Versus Four-Layer Compression Bandages for Venous Leg Ulcers: A Prospective Study

This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two-layer versus four-layer compression bandages in the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VLUs). A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital from August 2022 to July 2024. A total of 100 patients with chronic V...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-08, Vol.16 (8), p.e68189
Hauptverfasser: Shah, Bhushan, Vijendra, Adithya R, Bajaj, Jayant
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two-layer versus four-layer compression bandages in the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VLUs). A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital from August 2022 to July 2024. A total of 100 patients with chronic VLUs were sampled. Of the patients, 50 were given two-layer (group A) compression therapy, and the other 50 were given four-layer (group B) compression therapy. Outcomes after both therapies were analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 45.76 years, with a predominance of males (67%). Both bandaging systems demonstrated similar healing efficacy with no significant difference in ulcer size or healing time between groups. However, the four-layer bandage system required significantly fewer follow-ups (mean = 4.88) compared to the two-layer system (mean = 6.46) (p < 0.001). The mean total cost was higher for the four-layer system (₹3416) compared to the two-layer system (₹2907) (p = 0.004). Complications such as pain and pressure ulcers were comparable, though the four-layer system was associated with slightly higher discomfort and skin irritation. The four-layer bandage system may offer marginal advantages in wound healing and fewer follow-ups, but it is more expensive. The two-layer bandage system is more cost-effective and patient-friendly.
ISSN:2168-8184
2168-8184
DOI:10.7759/cureus.68189