Assessing the Aesthetic Performance of CAD/CAM Provisional Restorative Materials: A Spectrophotometric Analysis

Achieving color match between natural teeth and restorative materials is crucial in dentistry. Factors such as the light source, brightness, and opacity influence tooth color, determined by light absorption and scattering within the material. Advances in CAD/CAM systems have enhanced prosthodontic t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymers 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.2636
Hauptverfasser: Silvério, Sónia, Gomes, Catarina, Martins, Francisco, Reis, José Alexandre, Maurício, Paulo Durão, Maté-Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Achieving color match between natural teeth and restorative materials is crucial in dentistry. Factors such as the light source, brightness, and opacity influence tooth color, determined by light absorption and scattering within the material. Advances in CAD/CAM systems have enhanced prosthodontic treatments, particularly with new temporary materials, but data on their color stability and masking ability remains limited. However, data on the color stability and masking ability of these CAD/CAM materials is limited. Telio CAD-Temp and VITA CAD-Temp blocks were cut into slices and polished. Composite resin specimens were prepared using a custom-designed metal resin former and light-cured. Samples were paired randomly and assigned to experimental groups based on base type and thickness ( = 30). Samples were stored in a controlled environment for 24 h before color evaluation using an EasyShade V spectrophotometer. Color difference (Δ ) was calculated using *, *, and * values. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene's test, and three-way ANOVA, with post-hoc comparisons using the Bonferroni method (α = 0.05). Δ was classified according to perceptibility (PT = 1.2) and acceptability (AT = 2.7) values.
ISSN:2073-4360
2073-4360
DOI:10.3390/polym16182636