Burden of Portal Hypertension Complications Is Greater in Liver Transplant Wait-Listed Registrants with End-Stage Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes

Background and Aims Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) awaiting liver transplantation (LT) remains poorly defined. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between T2DM and clinical outcomes among patients with LT waitl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive diseases and sciences 2024-09, Vol.69 (9), p.3554-3562
Hauptverfasser: Yakubu, Idris, Flynn, Sean, Khan, Hiba, Nguyen, Madison, Razzaq, Rehan, Patel, Vaishali, Kumaran, Vinay, Sharma, Amit, Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aims Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) awaiting liver transplantation (LT) remains poorly defined. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between T2DM and clinical outcomes among patients with LT waitlist registrants. We hypothesize that the presence of T2DM will be associated with worse clinical outcomes. Methods 593 patients adult (age 18 years or older) who were registered for LT between 1/2010 and 1/2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. The impact of T2DM on liver-associated clinical events (LACE), survival, hospitalizations, need for renal replacement therapy, and likelihood of receiving LT were evaluated over a 12-month period. LACE was defined as variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the association between T2DM and clinical outcomes. Results The baseline prevalence of T2DM was 32% ( n  = 191) and patients with T2DM were more likely to have esophageal varices (61% vs. 47%, p  = 0.002) and history of variceal hemorrhage (23% vs. 16%, p  = 0.03). The presence of T2DM was associated with increased risk of incident ascites (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.11, 3.28, p  = 0.019). Patients with T2DM were more likely to require hospitalizations (56% vs. 49%, p  = 0.06), hospitalized with portal hypertension-related complications (22% vs. 14%; p  = 0.026), and require renal replacement therapy during their hospitalization. Patients with T2DM were less likely to receive a LT (37% vs. 45%; p  = 0.03). Regarding MELD labs, patients with T2DM had significantly lower bilirubin at each follow-up; however, no differences in INR and creatinine were noted. Conclusion Patients with T2DM are at increased risk of clinical outcomes. This risk is not captured in MELD score, which may potentially negatively affect their likelihood of receiving LT.
ISSN:0163-2116
1573-2568
1573-2568
DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08499-2