Global impact of unproductive splicing on human gene expression
Alternative splicing (AS) in human genes is widely viewed as a mechanism for enhancing proteomic diversity. AS can also impact gene expression levels without increasing protein diversity by producing ‘unproductive’ transcripts that are targeted for rapid degradation by nonsense-mediated decay (NMD)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature genetics 2024-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1851-1861 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Alternative splicing (AS) in human genes is widely viewed as a mechanism for enhancing proteomic diversity. AS can also impact gene expression levels without increasing protein diversity by producing ‘unproductive’ transcripts that are targeted for rapid degradation by nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). However, the relative importance of this regulatory mechanism remains underexplored. To better understand the impact of AS–NMD relative to other regulatory mechanisms, we analyzed population-scale genomic data across eight molecular assays, covering various stages from transcription to cytoplasmic decay. We report threefold more unproductive splicing compared with prior estimates using steady-state RNA. This unproductive splicing compounds across multi-intronic genes, resulting in 15% of transcript molecules from protein-coding genes being unproductive. Leveraging genetic variation across cell lines, we find that GWAS trait-associated loci explained by AS are as often associated with NMD-induced expression level differences as with differences in protein isoform usage. Our findings suggest that much of the impact of AS is mediated by NMD-induced changes in gene expression rather than diversification of the proteome.
Genomic analyses suggest that ~15% of transcript molecules are spliced into unproductive transcripts targeted by nonsense-mediated decay, which have a larger effect on gene expression than previously thought. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1061-4036 1546-1718 1546-1718 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41588-024-01872-x |