Efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetes peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Diabetes peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is mainly treated with diabetes as a whole, and there is no targeted treatment. Some studies have reported that adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for DPN has achieved a good effect, our study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HBOT for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2024-09, Vol.103 (36), p.e39699
Hauptverfasser: Weng, Jiyan, Ren, Haiyong, Guo, Qiaofeng, Huang, Kai, Ding, Liqing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Diabetes peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is mainly treated with diabetes as a whole, and there is no targeted treatment. Some studies have reported that adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for DPN has achieved a good effect, our study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HBOT for DPN and provide reference for the clinic by using a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet Database, Chinese BioMedical Database, China Scientific Journal Database, and Wanfang Database, for relevant randomized controlled trials published before July 2022. The population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, study design criteria were used to guide the selection of studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and STATA 14.0, with odds ratios and mean differences along with 95% confidence intervals serving as measures of effect size. Fourteen randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis, comprising 675 patients in the HBOT group and 648 in the standard therapy (ST) group. The HBOT group demonstrated a significantly higher effective treatment rate compared to the ST group (P 
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000039699