Round-robin testing for LMO2 and MYC as immunohistochemical markers to screen MYC rearrangements in aggressive large B-cell lymphoma
Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (aLBCL) include a heterogeneous group of lymphomas with diverse biological features. One of the approaches to the diagnosis of aLBCL is based on the identification of MYC rearrangements ( MYC -R), in addition to BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements by genetic techniques, ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology 2024-08, Vol.485 (2), p.307-314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (aLBCL) include a heterogeneous group of lymphomas with diverse biological features. One of the approaches to the diagnosis of aLBCL is based on the identification of
MYC
rearrangements (
MYC
-R), in addition to
BCL2
and
BCL6
rearrangements by genetic techniques, mainly fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Because of the low incidence of
MYC
-R, the identification of useful immunohistochemistry markers to select cases for
MYC
FISH testing may be useful in daily practice. In a previous work, we identified a strong association between the profile CD10 positive/LMO2 negative expression and the presence of
MYC
-R in aLBCL and obtained good intralaboratory reproducibility. In this study, we wanted to evaluate external reproducibility. To evaluate whether LMO2 can be a reproducible marker between observers 50 aLBCL cases were circulated among 7 hematopathologists of 5 hospitals. Fleiss’ kappa index for LMO2 and MYC were 0.87 and 0.70, respectively, indicating high agreement between observers. In addition, during 2021–2022, the enrolled centers included LMO2 in their diagnostic panels to evaluate prospectively the utility of the marker, and 213 cases were analyzed. Comparing LMO2 with MYC, the group of CD10 positive cases showed higher specificity (86% vs 79%), positive predictive value (66% vs 58%), likelihood positive value (5.47 vs 3.78), and accuracy (83% vs 79%), whereas the negative predictive values remained similar (90% vs 91%). These findings place LMO2 as a useful and reproducible marker to screen
MYC
-R in aLBCL. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0945-6317 1432-2307 1432-2307 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00428-023-03584-9 |