The utility of virtual monochromatic dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in meniscal imaging: a technical evaluation
To determine the feasibility of meniscal imaging using virtual monochromatic images obtained through dualenergy computed tomography (DECT) technique, and to determine which keV levels optimise contrast resolution. All DECT exams were performed on a Discovery CT750 HD system from GE Healthcare. Virtu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polish journal of radiology 2024, Vol.89, p.e324-340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine the feasibility of meniscal imaging using virtual monochromatic images obtained through dualenergy computed tomography (DECT) technique, and to determine which keV levels optimise contrast resolution.
All DECT exams were performed on a Discovery CT750 HD system from GE Healthcare. Virtual monochromatic images were reconstructed at 40 keV, 73 keV, 106 keV, and 139 keV. Contrast resolution of the medial and lateral menisci using a 5-point Likert scale at each keV level was determined through a consensus agreement by 2 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Friedman's and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare visualisation scores across different keV levels.
Seventeen knee exams from 10 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study. All patients included in the study cohort were male. The median age of patients was 46 years (interquartile range, 35-53 years). Virtual monochromatic images at 40 keV demonstrated highest contrast resolution of the menisci, with a statistically significant difference between contrast resolution scores at 40 keV and 76 keV, Friedman test:
< 0.0001.
Meniscal imaging is feasible using DECT virtual monochromatic images at low keV levels. Improved contrast resolution at these specified KeV values could pave the way for further research in this field to determine its role in the future as an alternative option for assessment of the menisci in patients with contraindications to MRI or in the setting of a periarticular ferromagnetic foreign body obscuring the field of view. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1733-134X 1899-0967 1899-0967 |
DOI: | 10.5114/pjr/187934 |