Outcome of patients with multivessel occlusion stroke after endovascular treatment

Introduction: Little is known about the implications of multivessel occlusions (MVO) in large vessel occlusion stroke patients who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT). Patients and methods: We report data from the MR CLEAN Registry: a prospective, observational study on all stroke patients who unde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European stroke journal 2024-06, Vol.9 (2), p.312-319
Hauptverfasser: LeCouffe, Natalie E, Treurniet, Kilian M, Kappelhof, Manon, Jansen, Ivo GH, Boers, Merel, Marquering, Henk A, Beenen, Ludo FM, Boiten, Jelis, van Zwam, Wim H, Yo, Lonneke SF, Majoie, Charles BLM, Roos, Yvo BWEM, Emmer, Bart J, Coutinho, Jonathan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: Little is known about the implications of multivessel occlusions (MVO) in large vessel occlusion stroke patients who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT). Patients and methods: We report data from the MR CLEAN Registry: a prospective, observational study on all stroke patients who underwent EVT in the Netherlands (March 2014–November 2017). We included patients with an intracranial target occlusion in the anterior circulation. An MVO was defined as an MCA occlusion (M1/M2) or intracranial ICA/ICA-T occlusion, with a concurrent second occlusion in the ACA or PCA territory confirmed on baseline CTA. To compare outcomes, we performed a 10:1 propensity score matching analysis with a logistic regression model including potential confounders. Outcome measures included 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) and mortality. Results: Of 2946 included patients, 71 patients (2.4%) had an MVO (87% concurrent ACA occlusion, 10% PCA occlusion, 3% ⩾3 occlusions). These patients were matched to 71 non-MVO patients. Before matching, MVO patients had a higher baseline NIHSS (median 18 vs 16, p = 0.001) and worse collateral status (absent collaterals: 17% vs 6%, p 
ISSN:2396-9873
2396-9881
2396-9881
DOI:10.1177/23969873231216811