The Effect of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy on Surgical Outcomes After Lymph Node Dissections for Stage III Melanoma; An Australian Cohort

Background Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for patients with stage III melanoma achieves high major pathologic response rates and high recurrence-free survival rates. This study aimed to determine how NAST with targeted therapies (TTs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) influences surgical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2024-08, Vol.31 (8), p.5324-5330
Hauptverfasser: Zijlker, Lisanne P., Chen, Henry, Spillane, Andrew J., Gonzalez, Maria, Pennington, Thomas E., Menzies, Alexander M., Lo, Serigne N., Ferguson, Peter, Rawson, Robert, Colebatch, Andrew J., Stretch, Jonathan R., Thompson, John F., Ch’ng, Sydney, Nieweg, Omgo, Shannon, Kerwin F., Long, Georgina V., Scolyer, Richard A., Saw, Robyn P. M., van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for patients with stage III melanoma achieves high major pathologic response rates and high recurrence-free survival rates. This study aimed to determine how NAST with targeted therapies (TTs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) influences surgical outcomes after lymph node dissection in terms of complications, morbidity, and textbook outcomes. Methods Patients who underwent a lymph node dissection after either NAST in a clinical trial or upfront surgery for stage III melanoma between 2014 and 2022 were identified from an institutional research database. Results The study included 89 NAST-treated patients and 79 upfront surgery-treated patients. The rate of postoperative complications did not differ between the NAST- and upfront surgery-treated patients (55% vs. 51%; p  = 0.643), and steroid treatment for drug toxicity did not influence the complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4–3; p  = 0.826). No significant differences in postoperative morbidity were observed in terms of seroma (23% vs. 11%; p  = 0.570) or lymphedema (36% vs. 51%; p  = 0.550). The rate of achieving a textbook outcome was comparable for the two groups (61% vs. 57%; p  = 0.641). Conclusions The surgical outcomes after lymph node dissections were comparable between the patients who received NAST and those who had upfront surgery, indicating that surgery can be safely performed after NAST with TT or ICI for stage III melanoma.
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-15274-0