Maneuvering Clinical Pathways for Crohn’s Disease

Purpose of Review Crohn’s disease management has changed significantly with increasing use of biologics. We review the recent literature on the clinical management of Crohn’s disease and new approaches in selecting and optimizing therapy. Recent Findings Recent studies have addressed the efficacy of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current gastroenterology reports 2019-05, Vol.21 (5), p.20-20, Article 20
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Thomas X., Cohen, Russell D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose of Review Crohn’s disease management has changed significantly with increasing use of biologics. We review the recent literature on the clinical management of Crohn’s disease and new approaches in selecting and optimizing therapy. Recent Findings Recent studies have addressed the efficacy of proactive anti-TNFα trough level monitoring, the efficacy of biosimilars, and the efficacy and immunogenicity of newer biologics including anti-integrin therapy and anti-IL12/23 therapy. Optimizing anti-TNFα therapy according to trough concentrations correlates with improved remission rates. Patients can be switched from the reference drug to a biosimilar, or vice versa, without a measurable change in efficacy, safety, or immunogenicity. Immunomodulators are effective in decreasing immunogenicity and boosting anti-TNFα drug level. The anti-integrin and anti-IL12/23 therapies are effective as induction and maintenance therapy with low immunogenicity and excellent safety profiles. Patients at high risk for post-operative recurrence should be started on a biologic therapy within 4 weeks post-op. Summary Multiple biologic therapies are currently available for treatment of Crohn’s disease including anti-TNFα therapy, anti-integrin therapy, and anti-IL12/23 therapy. The choice of first-line therapy should be based on individual risk-benefit analysis, route of administration, and patient preference. Patient with inadequate response should have their trough level checked and therapy optimized. Therapeutic prophylaxis for post-operative recurrence should be based on patient’s risk factors for recurrence.
ISSN:1522-8037
1534-312X
1534-312X
DOI:10.1007/s11894-019-0687-4