Need for cross-level iterative re-entry in models of visual processing

Two main hypotheses regarding the directional flow of visual information processing in the brain have been proposed: feed-forward (bottom-up) and re-entrant (top-down). Early theories espoused feed-forward principles in which processing was said to advance from simple to increasingly complex attribu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2024-06, Vol.31 (3), p.979-984
Hauptverfasser: Spalek, Thomas M., Unnikrishnan, K. P., Di Lollo, Vincent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 984
container_issue 3
container_start_page 979
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 31
creator Spalek, Thomas M.
Unnikrishnan, K. P.
Di Lollo, Vincent
description Two main hypotheses regarding the directional flow of visual information processing in the brain have been proposed: feed-forward (bottom-up) and re-entrant (top-down). Early theories espoused feed-forward principles in which processing was said to advance from simple to increasingly complex attributes terminating at a higher area where conscious perceptions occur. That view is disconfirmed by advances in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, which implicate re-entrant two-way signaling as the predominant form of communication between brain regions. With some notable exceptions, the notion of re-entrant processing has had a relatively modest effect on computational models of perception and cognition, which continue to be predominantly based on feed-forward or within-level re-entrant principles. In the present work we describe five sets of empirical findings that defy interpretation in terms of feed-forward or within-level re-entrant principles. We conclude by urging the adoption of psychophysical, biological, and computational models based on cross-level iterative re-entrant principles.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13423-023-02396-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11192676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3075726909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d2ec0f090b03425c718933a16fe3b1cc89d7ac5f686eb4ac5e0f89ca91f9c87b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhi0Eohd4ARbIEhs2LuM48WWFUNWbVMEG1pbjjA-ucuKDnRy1b1-XlHJZsBh5pPnmnxn_hLzhcCJUpz8ULtpGMFjDSHb7jBzyTnDWiQae1xykYUbo9oAclXIDAJ008iU5EEq3Wnb6kJx_RhxoSJn6nEphI-5xpHHG7Oa4R5qR4TTnOxonuk0DjoWmQPexLG6ku5w8lhKnzSvyIrix4OvH95h8Oz_7enrJrr9cXJ1-uma-beTMhgY9BDDQQ12984prI4TjMqDouffaDMr5LkgtsW9rhhC08c7wYLxWvTgmH1fd3dJvcfAPu7nR7nLcunxnk4v278oUv9tN2lvOuWmkklXh_aNCTj8WLLPdxuJxHN2EaSm20UorMK1oK_ruH_QmLXmq91kBqlONNGAq1azUzw_MGJ624WAffLKrTxbWMNLe1qa3f97x1PLLmAqIFSi1NG0w_579H9l7JtOfuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3075726909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Need for cross-level iterative re-entry in models of visual processing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Spalek, Thomas M. ; Unnikrishnan, K. P. ; Di Lollo, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Spalek, Thomas M. ; Unnikrishnan, K. P. ; Di Lollo, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Two main hypotheses regarding the directional flow of visual information processing in the brain have been proposed: feed-forward (bottom-up) and re-entrant (top-down). Early theories espoused feed-forward principles in which processing was said to advance from simple to increasingly complex attributes terminating at a higher area where conscious perceptions occur. That view is disconfirmed by advances in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, which implicate re-entrant two-way signaling as the predominant form of communication between brain regions. With some notable exceptions, the notion of re-entrant processing has had a relatively modest effect on computational models of perception and cognition, which continue to be predominantly based on feed-forward or within-level re-entrant principles. In the present work we describe five sets of empirical findings that defy interpretation in terms of feed-forward or within-level re-entrant principles. We conclude by urging the adoption of psychophysical, biological, and computational models based on cross-level iterative re-entrant principles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02396-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37848658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Back propagation ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Brain ; Brain - physiology ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Humans ; Information processing ; Models, Neurological ; Neural networks ; Neurophysiology ; Propagation ; Psychology ; Theoretical/Review ; Visual Pathways - physiology ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2024-06, Vol.31 (3), p.979-984</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jun 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d2ec0f090b03425c718933a16fe3b1cc89d7ac5f686eb4ac5e0f89ca91f9c87b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13423-023-02396-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13423-023-02396-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37848658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spalek, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unnikrishnan, K. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Lollo, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Need for cross-level iterative re-entry in models of visual processing</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Two main hypotheses regarding the directional flow of visual information processing in the brain have been proposed: feed-forward (bottom-up) and re-entrant (top-down). Early theories espoused feed-forward principles in which processing was said to advance from simple to increasingly complex attributes terminating at a higher area where conscious perceptions occur. That view is disconfirmed by advances in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, which implicate re-entrant two-way signaling as the predominant form of communication between brain regions. With some notable exceptions, the notion of re-entrant processing has had a relatively modest effect on computational models of perception and cognition, which continue to be predominantly based on feed-forward or within-level re-entrant principles. In the present work we describe five sets of empirical findings that defy interpretation in terms of feed-forward or within-level re-entrant principles. We conclude by urging the adoption of psychophysical, biological, and computational models based on cross-level iterative re-entrant principles.</description><subject>Back propagation</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neurophysiology</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Theoretical/Review</subject><subject>Visual Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhi0Eohd4ARbIEhs2LuM48WWFUNWbVMEG1pbjjA-ucuKDnRy1b1-XlHJZsBh5pPnmnxn_hLzhcCJUpz8ULtpGMFjDSHb7jBzyTnDWiQae1xykYUbo9oAclXIDAJ008iU5EEq3Wnb6kJx_RhxoSJn6nEphI-5xpHHG7Oa4R5qR4TTnOxonuk0DjoWmQPexLG6ku5w8lhKnzSvyIrix4OvH95h8Oz_7enrJrr9cXJ1-uma-beTMhgY9BDDQQ12984prI4TjMqDouffaDMr5LkgtsW9rhhC08c7wYLxWvTgmH1fd3dJvcfAPu7nR7nLcunxnk4v278oUv9tN2lvOuWmkklXh_aNCTj8WLLPdxuJxHN2EaSm20UorMK1oK_ruH_QmLXmq91kBqlONNGAq1azUzw_MGJ624WAffLKrTxbWMNLe1qa3f97x1PLLmAqIFSi1NG0w_579H9l7JtOfuQ</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Spalek, Thomas M.</creator><creator>Unnikrishnan, K. P.</creator><creator>Di Lollo, Vincent</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Need for cross-level iterative re-entry in models of visual processing</title><author>Spalek, Thomas M. ; Unnikrishnan, K. P. ; Di Lollo, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d2ec0f090b03425c718933a16fe3b1cc89d7ac5f686eb4ac5e0f89ca91f9c87b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Back propagation</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neurophysiology</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Theoretical/Review</topic><topic>Visual Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spalek, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unnikrishnan, K. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Lollo, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spalek, Thomas M.</au><au>Unnikrishnan, K. P.</au><au>Di Lollo, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Need for cross-level iterative re-entry in models of visual processing</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><stitle>Psychon Bull Rev</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>979</spage><epage>984</epage><pages>979-984</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Two main hypotheses regarding the directional flow of visual information processing in the brain have been proposed: feed-forward (bottom-up) and re-entrant (top-down). Early theories espoused feed-forward principles in which processing was said to advance from simple to increasingly complex attributes terminating at a higher area where conscious perceptions occur. That view is disconfirmed by advances in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, which implicate re-entrant two-way signaling as the predominant form of communication between brain regions. With some notable exceptions, the notion of re-entrant processing has had a relatively modest effect on computational models of perception and cognition, which continue to be predominantly based on feed-forward or within-level re-entrant principles. In the present work we describe five sets of empirical findings that defy interpretation in terms of feed-forward or within-level re-entrant principles. We conclude by urging the adoption of psychophysical, biological, and computational models based on cross-level iterative re-entrant principles.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37848658</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13423-023-02396-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024-06, Vol.31 (3), p.979-984
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11192676
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Back propagation
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brain
Brain - physiology
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Psychology
Humans
Information processing
Models, Neurological
Neural networks
Neurophysiology
Propagation
Psychology
Theoretical/Review
Visual Pathways - physiology
Visual Perception - physiology
title Need for cross-level iterative re-entry in models of visual processing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A57%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Need%20for%20cross-level%20iterative%20re-entry%20in%20models%20of%20visual%20processing&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Spalek,%20Thomas%20M.&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=979&rft.epage=984&rft.pages=979-984&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13423-023-02396-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3075726909%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3075726909&rft_id=info:pmid/37848658&rfr_iscdi=true