Serial Mass Screening for Tuberculosis Among Incarcerated Persons in Brazil

Abstract Background An active search for tuberculosis cases through mass screening is widely described as a tool to improve case detection in hyperendemic settings. However, its effectiveness in high-risk populations, such as incarcerated people, is debated. Methods Between 2017 and 2021, 3 rounds o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2024-06, Vol.78 (6), p.1669-1676
Hauptverfasser: Pivetta de Araujo, Rafaele Carla, Martinez, Leonardo, da Silva Santos, Andrea, Ferreira Lemos, Everton, Dias de Oliveira, Roberto, Croda, Mariana, Porto Batestin Silva, Dâmaris, Lemes, Isabella Beatriz Gonçalves, Cunha, Eunice Atsuko Totumi, Gonçalves, Thais Oliveira, Pereira dos Santos, Paulo Cesar, Oliveira da Silva, Bruna, Cavalheiro Maymone Gonçalves, Crhistinne, Andrews, Jason, Croda, Julio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background An active search for tuberculosis cases through mass screening is widely described as a tool to improve case detection in hyperendemic settings. However, its effectiveness in high-risk populations, such as incarcerated people, is debated. Methods Between 2017 and 2021, 3 rounds of mass screening were carried out in 3 Brazilian prisons. Social and health questionnaires, chest X-rays, and Xpert MTB/RIF were performed. Results More than 80% of the prison population was screened. Overall, 684 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis were diagnosed. Prevalence across screening rounds was not statistically different. Among incarcerated persons with symptoms, the overall prevalence of tuberculosis per 100 000 persons was 8497 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7346–9811), 11 115 (95% CI, 9471–13 082), and 7957 (95% CI, 6380–9882) in screening rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Similar to our overall results, there were no statistical differences between screening rounds and within individual prisons. We found no statistical differences in Computer-Aided Detection for TB version 5 scores across screening rounds among people with tuberculosis—the median scores in rounds 1, 2, and 3 were 82 (interquartile range [IQR], 63–97), 77 (IQR, 60–94), and 81 (IQR, 67–92), respectively. Conclusions In this environment with hyperendemic rates of tuberculosis, 3 rounds of mass screening did not reduce the overall tuberculosis burden. In prisons, where a substantial number of tuberculosis cases is undiagnosed annually, a range of complementary interventions and more frequent tuberculosis cases screening may be required. We conducted 3 rounds of mass tuberculosis screening in heavily crowded, high-burden prisons in Brazil. We found extraordinarily high prevalence of tuberculosis, ranging from 3700 to 4000 cases per 100 000 persons. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract This graphical abstract is also available at Tidbit: https://tidbitapp.io/tidbits/serial-mass-screening-for-tuberculosis-among-incarcerated-persons-in-brazil
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae055