Redefining tumour suppressor genes: exceptions to the two-hit hypothesis

Knudson's two-hit model of tumour suppressor genes supposes that two mutations are required to cause a tumour, one occurring in each of the two alleles of the gene. Many such cancer genes exhibiting biallelic disruption and truncating point mutations have been identified, revealing the success...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS 2003-10, Vol.60 (10), p.2147-2163
1. Verfasser: Paige, A J W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Knudson's two-hit model of tumour suppressor genes supposes that two mutations are required to cause a tumour, one occurring in each of the two alleles of the gene. Many such cancer genes exhibiting biallelic disruption and truncating point mutations have been identified, revealing the success of the model. Despite changes in our concept of cancer genes, two inactivating point mutations are still considered the hallmark of tumour suppressor genes. Recently, however, more and more reports describe candidate tumour suppressors that do not conform to this standard definition, including haploinsufficient genes requiring inactivation of only one allele, and genes inactivated not by mutation but rather epigenetic hypermethylation. This review describes some of these exceptions and proposes a revised tumour suppressor gene definition to facilitate the identification of this new generation of tumour suppressor loci.
ISSN:1420-682X
1420-9071
DOI:10.1007/s00018-003-3027-6