A randomized phase 2 study of sapanisertib in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone in women with advanced, recurrent, or persistent endometrial cancer

This phase 2 study investigated sapanisertib (selective dual inhibitor of mTORC1/2) alone, or in combination with paclitaxel or TAK-117 (a selective small molecule inhibitor of PI3K), versus paclitaxel alone in advanced, recurrent, or persistent endometrial cancer. Patients with histologic diagnosis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2023-11, Vol.178, p.110-118
Hauptverfasser: Han, Sileny N., Oza, Amit, Colombo, Nicoletta, Oaknin, Ana, Raspagliesi, Francesco, Wenham, Robert M., Braicu, Elena Ioana, Jewell, Andrea, Makker, Vicky, Krell, Jonathan, Alía, Eva María Guerra, Baurain, Jean-François, Su, Zhenqiang, Neuwirth, Rachel, Vincent, Sylvie, Sedarati, Farhad, Faller, Douglas V., Scambia, Giovanni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This phase 2 study investigated sapanisertib (selective dual inhibitor of mTORC1/2) alone, or in combination with paclitaxel or TAK-117 (a selective small molecule inhibitor of PI3K), versus paclitaxel alone in advanced, recurrent, or persistent endometrial cancer. Patients with histologic diagnosis of endometrial cancer (1–2 prior regimens) were randomized to 28-day cycles on four treatment arms: 1) weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, and 15); 2) weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 + oral sapanisertib 4 mg on days 2–4, 9–11, 16–18, and 23–25; 3) weekly sapanisertib 30 mg, or 4) sapanisertib 4 mg + TAK-117200 mg on days 1–3, 8–10, 15–17, and 22–24. Of 241 patients randomized, 234 received treatment (paclitaxel, n = 87 [3 ongoing]; paclitaxel+sapanisertib, n = 86 [3 ongoing]; sapanisertib, n = 41; sapanisertib+TAK-117, n = 20). The sapanisertib and sapanisertib+TAK-117 arms were closed to enrollment after futility analyses. After a median follow-up of 14.4 (paclitaxel) versus 17.2 (paclitaxel+sapanisertib) months, median progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) was 3.7 versus 5.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–1.15; p = 0.139); in patients with endometrioid histology (n = 116), median PFS was 3.3 versus 5.7 months (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.43–1.03). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event rates were 54.0% with paclitaxel versus 89.5% paclitaxel+sapanisertib. Our findings support inclusion of chemotherapy combinations with investigational agents for advanced or metastatic disease. The primary endpoint was not met and toxicity was manageable. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02725268 •Patients with endometrioid tumors showed improvement (PFS, CBR, and CBR-16) with paclitaxel + sapanisertib vs paclitaxel.•There were no significant differences in PFS between the paclitaxel and paclitaxel + sapanisertib arms.•Treatment with paclitaxel + sapanisertib had limited toxicity with no new safety signals.
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.013