Quality of vision clinical outcomes for a new fully-refractive extended depth of focus Intraocular Lens

Background/objective To evaluate the visual performance of a purely refractive extended depth of focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL). Subjects/methods A prospective, multi-center, randomized, subject/evaluator-masked study. Subjects were bilaterally implanted with the EDF test (Model ZEN00V, TECNIS P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2024-05, Vol.38 (Suppl 1), p.9-14
Hauptverfasser: Corbett, Dean, Black, Daniel, Roberts, Timothy V., Cronin, Brendan, Gunn, David, Bala, Chandra, Versace, Patrick, Tsai, Linda, Papadatou, Eleni, Alarcon, Aixa, Vilupuru, Srividhya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/objective To evaluate the visual performance of a purely refractive extended depth of focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL). Subjects/methods A prospective, multi-center, randomized, subject/evaluator-masked study. Subjects were bilaterally implanted with the EDF test (Model ZEN00V, TECNIS PureSee™ IOL, N  = 60) or an enhanced monofocal control (Model ICB00, TECNIS Eyhance™ IOL, N  = 57) IOL. Monocular corrected distance (CDVA), intermediate (DCIVA), near acuities (DCNVA) and patient reported visual symptoms were evaluated at the 6-month visit. Monocular mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) and depth of focus (DOF) testing were assessed at 3 months. Results CDVA (Mean ± SD) was −0.06 ± 0.08 for test and −0.05 ± 0.08 logMAR for control groups. DCIVA was 0.13 ± 0.08 for test and 0.18 ± 0.14 logMAR for control groups ( p  = 0.0127). DCNVA was 0.37 ± 0.10 for test and 0.43 ± 0.16 logMAR for control groups ( p  = 0.0137). Test lens was statistically superior for intermediate and near. Overall, 91.7% (halos), 95.0% (starbursts) and 95.0% (glare) of test lens patients reported that they did not experience, were not bothered, or were slightly bothered by specific visual symptoms, compared to 98.2%, 100% and 96.5% in the control group. The DOF range over which monocular visual acuity was 0.20 logMAR or better was −1.6 D for the test lens. Mesopic CS was comparable between both groups, falling within 0.11 log units for all measured cycles per degree with and without glare. Conclusion The EDF IOL demonstrated extended range of vision and statistically superior intermediate and near performance compared to the monofocal IOL. Distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and dysphotopsia profile were similar to the monofocal IOL.
ISSN:0950-222X
1476-5454
1476-5454
DOI:10.1038/s41433-024-03039-8