Should pipeline nitrous oxide be discontinued in secondary care: A cost-benefit analysis
Nitrous oxide (N O) has seen a marked decline in its usage in recent years due to its adverse clinical effects. We audited the practice in our department to evaluate the N O consumption and cost-effectiveness of its supply. Electronic anesthesia records of all patients anesthetized in our main opera...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Saudi journal of anaesthesia 2024-04, Vol.18 (2), p.194-196 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nitrous oxide (N
O) has seen a marked decline in its usage in recent years due to its adverse clinical effects. We audited the practice in our department to evaluate the N
O consumption and cost-effectiveness of its supply.
Electronic anesthesia records of all patients anesthetized in our main operating rooms in a typical month were reviewed retrospectively, and utilization of N
O was noted in addition to the patient demographics, surgical procedure, and specialty.
A total of 950 patients were anesthetized, and 3.1% received N
O. The annual usage was estimated to be 72,871 liters, with a leakage of 3,883,105 liters to the environment, posing a safety hazard and wasting 149,612.50 SAR.
Notable costs and environmental benefits may be achieved by substituting a piped supply of N
O with portable E-cylinders on demand in operating rooms for rational use. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1658-354X 0975-3125 |
DOI: | 10.4103/sja.sja_791_23 |