Cysteine cathepsins L and X differentially modulate interactions between myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor cells

Increased proteolytic activity of cysteine cathepsins has long been known to facilitate malignant progression, and it has also been associated with tumor-promoting roles of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Consequently, cysteine cathepsins have gained much attention as potential targets for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Immunotherapy, 2020-09, Vol.69 (9), p.1869-1880
Hauptverfasser: Jakoš, Tanja, Pišlar, Anja, Pečar Fonović, Urša, Švajger, Urban, Kos, Janko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Increased proteolytic activity of cysteine cathepsins has long been known to facilitate malignant progression, and it has also been associated with tumor-promoting roles of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Consequently, cysteine cathepsins have gained much attention as potential targets for cancer therapies. However, cross-talk between tumor cells and MDSCs needs to be taken into account when studying the efficacy of cathepsin inhibitors as anti-cancer agents. Here, we demonstrate the potential of the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line to generate functional MDSCs from CD14 + cells of healthy human donors. During this transition to MDSCs, the overall levels of cysteine cathepsins increased, with the largest responses for cathepsins L and X. We used small-molecule inhibitors of cathepsins L and X (i.e., CLIK-148, Z9, respectively) to investigate their functional impact on tumor cells and immune cells in this co-culture system. Interactions with peripheral blood mononuclear cells reduced MDA-MB-231 cell invasion, while inhibition of cathepsin X activity by Z9 restored invasion. Inhibition of cathepsin L activity using CLIK-148 resulted in significantly increased CD8 + cytotoxicity. Of note, inhibition of cathepsins L and X in separate immune or tumor cells did not promote these functional changes. Together, our findings underlie the importance of tumor cell–immune cell interactions in the evaluation of the anti-cancer potential of cysteine cathepsin inhibitors.
ISSN:0340-7004
1432-0851
DOI:10.1007/s00262-020-02592-x